That "moderator" who was "dealing" with the pawz baby fur guy was clearly out of his duresdiction and perhaps therefore speaking with an imagined air of authority (which irritated me somewhat). But he did make an excellent point about the fact that, this pawz person made it clear what his motives were. I'd agree that anyone who posts video clips of dogs playing dominance games and photographs of other people's babies in the same posting should have their mental health and sexual motives questioned.
The whole online "furry" community concerns me very much. It attracts a lot of kids, mainly young, vulnerable teenage girls and a few boys - but it also attracts a lot of very perverted, mentally screwed up men, who manipulate and prey on these vunerable kids, sometimes by pretending to be kids themselves. It's a pedophile attack waiting to happen, and probably already has happened.
I've not seen a lot of the material, I've just been to the sites and seen the potential and the kind of demographic that visit them. And I must say it's alarming.
|