View Single Post
  #1  
09-06-2005, 08:18 PM
Dipstikk's Avatar
Dipstikk
The Junk Food Junkie
 
: Nov 2002
: IN MY IMPENETRABLE FORTRESS
: 2,404
Blog Entries: 19
Rep Power: 25
Dipstikk  (627)Dipstikk  (627)Dipstikk  (627)Dipstikk  (627)Dipstikk  (627)Dipstikk  (627)
The long-term rammificatons of a hypospaedius

Once upon a time, a little boy named Matthew Nicholas Seeger (you know him as Dipstikk) was born. But as great a day as this was, something sucked even greater: little Matthew was born without a urethra, and the doctors had to proform a procedure known as a "hypospaedius," in which the doctors would create a new urethra where there was none.

The surgury turned out to be a success, and everyone was happy now that little Matthew could pee correctly. But as time passed, little Matthew grew up to be a big Matthew, and soon found out that not every part of him was growing with him. Why, with his bodily proportions, you'd think he'd be hung like a horse. But this wasn't so.

Over time, big Matthew became more and more frustrated with the fact that he could only get a 3-inch erection (laugh track). One day, big Matthew got the idea to contact a urologest (dispite how much he hated the last visit he made to one) and inquire about a way to increase his size to what it should be (preferrably medicinally, surgury is out of the question. They've already done enough to it)?

Then, big Matthew had second thoughts. Does he really need it? Would it cause his urethra to close up again if it grew? And would it seem ungrateful to the doctors who proformed the procedure, so he wouldn't pee out of the front of his nuts?

But big Matt is heartset on this. It would be a huge boost to his self-esteem, and his dumb-as-a-stump bastard friend Mike would stop making fun of him for it.

So I ask you, should I go through with it? I mean, I'm definately going to, but I want to hear what you think.
__________________
DIPSTIKK HE IS SO COOL, FORUM HE IS A FOOOOOL...

Reply With Quote