:
|
but what if the Bisexuals chosen did, even if it was just slightly stronger, have a preferance towards one sex rather than the other.
|
This can be the case, but that doesn't mean they're not bisexual. That's like saying: "My grandpa is quater hispanic, but I'm sure as hell not!". If they have a preference toward one sex but are willing to be involved with another, that still makes them bissexual for accepting the option of being with the other gender. I'm just saying that they are generalizing all of these people.
:
|
Seriously, SM, ignore, no, in fact FORGET Dino's comments for a minute, read the article yourself and then sit and think for a minute about the likelyhood that the Scientists want to eviserate Bisexuality. And then ask yourself "Why?"
|
Lust for gold? This is indeed an American article, and quite often Americans can be religious... Like any country, but America especially. And for some reason, being a homosexual is bad in their book.
I'm not riding off Dino's comment. I happen to share the same opinion as him. Is there something wrong here?
:
|
Studies saying Homosexuality is natural - scrap them, the people could've been influenced by Satan! Hell, Big Red could've influenced the animals to have sex with the same sex as them (i love you Cyber-Slig)!!
|
Homosexuality is not natural. Nor is bisexuality. Any sexuality except hetero isn't natural. But who ****ing cares? It doesn't matter if it occurs naturally or not.
:
|
I hate this sudden wave of intolerance on the forums, bring back some of the original members, i say! Surfacing, Danny, Tom, Claire, Dequibenzibobbalob (or whatever his name was), DH, S'laskia and the others!
|
Bah, go and cry to your mammy. Start the 'Old OWF' on invisionfree and hope some people drop by.