:
|
Heh, reminds me of a "research" that said that people who abstain from pre-marital sex are more likely to engage in other forms of sex. When, from what I've read, their "test subjects" were picked from those who were most likely to do the above, so it was really no surprise.
So, I guess what I'm saying is that they could have done "research" into it, but the people they surveyed were taken from those who aren't truly bisexual. Then the researchers just say, "Look, we've done the research, and we've 'proved' that bisexuality doesn't exist!"
It's a logical fallacy(sp?), it's basically like saying:
"Sheep, my friend, are all white. I have two sheep and they are both white."
|
Yes, there are many ways to "rig" scientific research to provide a desired outcome.
To be honest I find the outcome of this "research" laughable. If bisexuality doesn't exist, then that must mean that I am schizophrenic, and my two personalities have opposing sexualities. It's just stupid, how do you explain away the existance of something that you claimed didn't exist? It can't be done without being utterly stupid.