Statikk, am I correct in my understanding that you're basically saying that there's no such thing as true facts and figures? Because that would be implied if your defense is to state that you feel there is no such thing as unbiased political neutrality in statistical information like votes.
That's a pretty weak defense to be honest. Considering that the votes have to be counted by an independant unbiased organisation, any fraudulent votes would have to be very scattered and in quite small numbers in order to evade detection. This would mean that their effect, if any, would be nominal, and would only be a deciding factor if it came to a very close tie.
|