:
|
Yes, because every against argument people put across you seem to retort with "Oh no, that's society implementing that idea in you. No. Be quiet now"
|
That's because so far a lot of people have just said "sex with children is bad" - that isn't what it's about. People have been really struggling to explain why sex with children or among children is bad, and most (including yourself) have come up with highly unsatisfactory excuses involving innocence, responsibility, ability to choose, psychological effects, and other sorts of nonsense. It's just clutching at straws, there's no hard evidence that has been offered, just speculation, and it's showing that rather than look at it objectively, and neutrally, you're coming at it from the perspective of someone who has already made their mind up about it. Debates do not work if you're closed minded or you've already made your mind up.
:
|
Thinking about it, i think that society is too harsh. But it has a point. It's not exactly healthy to allow 3 year olds to have sex.
|
There you go again. WHY is it not healthy to allow 3 year olds to have sex? What's your evidence for this?
Have you considered that maybe the whole reason why it affects people mentally and in a bad way is because they're constantly encountering other people who are telling them that it's such a bad thing? If enough people shake their head, tut, and tell you how horrible it is, you'll start to believe it and react to it accordingly. I firmly believe that it isn't the actions themselves but more the society that lives around those actions - if the values of your society say that having sex at a young age is bad, then you're going to feel bad about it.
Also, you could quite happily say that eating food with CDs could have bad psychological effects - the fact that there is no evidence to say that it doesn't, does not instantly mean that you can say it does. It means that it can't be proven either way, because nobody does it.