:
|
You have moved on. The initial statement was about children exploring their sexuality, this then moved on to the age of consent being abolished and adults being allowed to have relations with children.
To actually get back to the point (the one that is completely different to the title 'Children sexually abusing each other', and is more akin to 'Children exploring their sexuality'), i have no problem with a child who is fully sexually developed exploring it's sexuality with it's peer group. I do, however, see a problem with adults getting involved and children of a younger age doing things they're not physically mature enough for.
If we can stick to this line of topic instead of deviating to Paedophilia, or the age of consent, then an argument can be put across far better.
To Carc - okay, so children from the age of three years old can experience orgasms, i fail to see how allowing children of this age to have sex would be a responsible thing to do.
Finally, what exactly is the rush? You all bring up the fact that sex is enjoyable et al, but surely allowing children (11-) to do it would only make them do it constantly, which would, potentially, run the risk of them becoming "addicted". In a responsible society, sex shouldn't really matter. I personally couldn't give a tap-dancing shissen whether i was going to have sex or not in the next year, it's not one of my priorities and i doubt it will be. And discussing it as if it's something that will help society in some way is fairly immature. I've repeatedly read that it would somehow make a society a better place if we could just screw each other...
Erm, how?
|
The subject is about sex and society, and I've already told you this - although it begins with the example of children having sex with children, it's more about the broader picture, the "what if?" implication that society may be overreacting to what is simply normal and natural behaviour - the "who is wrong here?" question on the end of the title should've given that away to you. Basically, the title should be, "Is society wrong about sex?". AND THAT IS THE LAST TIME I WILL BE DISCUSSING THE TITLE AND SUBJECT OF THIS THREAD. I DID NOT PUT IT HERE FOR US TO HAVE A STUPID NONPRODUCTIVE OFFTOPIC DISCUSSION. Like I said I've already told you this once before.
And Jacob, could you please try to be less closed minded? I'm hardly inclined to continue a debate with you if all you're going to do is stubbornly defend your point by desperately hunting for faults in other people's points. To be honest you've not shown me any valuable or credible evidence for your argument, and so far the only convincing points that I've seen made have been those FOR, not against.