[Dino]

Well i depends on how old the child E.G: If the child was 8 sex would be innapropriate and pointless because he has not developed (as in puberty) he can't exactly put fcking to good use, however if they had gone through puberty well...I dunno maybe.

I think you're missing it.

Firstly, it's only inappropriate because society has told you that it's inappropriate. Society has given you these meaningless illogical values that sex is bad, and for adults only.

Secondly, it's not pointless. It has been proven that children can and often do enjoy sex in their own way. So remove yourself from your society bred thoughts for a moment, and ask yourself why it's bad to do something enjoyable.

However, the riskes of sexually transmitted diseases are still there.

It's actually impossible to get an STD from a virgin. The only time it can happen is if someone is born with AIDs. Therefore STDs aren't really a problem among children. They'd only start when adults started having sex with children, and one could argue that the morality of that is shaky, due to the fact that children are inherantly more vulnerable and don't know any better when they're just being abused, which I feel would still be possible if sex was normalised.

'I can only think of one obvious answer. The adult has more developed sexual organs.'

I think this proves my point. Even when full intercourse hasn't occured between an adult and a child, the child still manages to become mentally f*cked up and hate the fact that the sexual relations occured when they did.

In all honesty, this does reek of NAMBLA's own beliefs.

What's NAMBLA? A member here or something?

That aside I don't get your point. I can't see a reason why a child would be mentally fucked up by doing something so natural. In fact I think Society making sex a bad thing does more damage than normalising it ever would. Imagine how free of crime and sexual tension the world would be, if we just screwed as casually as we laughed, cried, ate, and drank.