The US legal system has more EVIDENCE and more access to INFORMATION than anyone else does - they have the police, FBI, and CSI. I never said that the legal system doesn't have it's flaws, but to be honest given that this was such a controvercial case I doubt that those flaws got anywhere even close to within a mile of that courtroom. The jury were especially picked for neutrality, and they decided from the evidence given that Jacko was not guilty, a verdict with which the Judge agreed.
The US legal system is not about who can argue the best, and is actually down to who has the most credibility. In this case it was Jacko. But the question is, did he REALLY do it? I think the answer is probably no. I find it to be too big of a coincidence that so far all the people who've played the paedophile card have been a bunch of celebrity money leechers, and that so far they've all been after money settlements rather than justice.
The reality of the situation is, that NOBODY truly knows. Anyone who says that they "know the truth" are lying. But to be honest I see more evidence FOR jackson than there is AGAINST.
|