:
|
All males are born with, basically, a flap of skin over the head of the penis; a natural sleave made of skin for your nether region, so to speak. And that's all it is...loose skin. It serves no desernable purpose. It's like the appendix; Maybe it served some long-forgotton purpose in the womb, but now that you're alive and one your own, it's utterly useless. Circumcision is simply cutting off this natural, "sleave." It doesn't reduce size or potency or any crap like that.
|
So, just because it serves no purpose, we should all go out and get it removed? Like I said earlier, why stop at that? Why not remove our pinky toes as well? Or our appendix?
:
|
Now, there are a few, small benefits to being circumcised. Obviously, there are very few (Believe me...if there were a lot, EVERYONE would be getting circumcised). To start with, there are the previously mentioned diseases, but those are so rare, that it's not a big risk at all. It's really a matter of convienience, really. There is one thing that sleave excells at...collecting bacteria and gunk from the surrounding evironment. Now, if that's your thing, whatever. But for those of us whose hobbies to not include cultivating a colony of bacteria in our genital area, we've got to clean it out...that is, those of us who are not circumcised. If you are, those things just come off in the shower like everything else. If you're not...well, you've got some cleaning to do, haven't you?
|
I have to ask, Nepharski, are you circumcised? Because you don't sound like you know what you're talking about. Bacteria / etc basically only cultivates on the penis with the buildup of smegma and other grime. However, it is basically only prevalent in pre-pubescent males where the foreskin has not detached from the glans-penis. When the foreskin has detached, I can honestly say that being non-circumcised, I did not have a problem with any 'build-up'. And I'm talking way back in the day when my showers were
weeks in-between. Though, that was probably because masturbating somewhat causes you to clean up. And if I remember, you're a strict Christian... So perhaps you do have a problem there with it building up.
:
|
On top of this, I've heard that there is a sensitivity thing to. This flap isupposedly makes sex somewhat less comfortable, and removing it is supposed to make it less painful, and more...pleasureable. I say supposedly, because I myself have no experience or personal knowledge for comparision. Maybe the doctors are wrong. I dont' know.
|
The foreskin does nothing of the sort. It makes it more comfortable, not to mention all that extra sensitivity. Removing the foreskin does reduce sensitivity, go look it up, it is well documented.
Finally, I'd just like to mention that I cannot honestly see how men masturbate without a foreskin. I know they do the same thing, but, it's the foreskin which provides the pleasure. Not to mention the friction would be worse
Alcar...