:
|
Why is it that I only ever hear this kind of thing from homosexuals, crackpot "scientific discoveries" in womens magazine articles and saggy-breasted hairy-legged womens rights activists?
|
I'm neither homosexual, nor do I have saggy breasts and hairy legs, but I certainly agree with what Jacob said.
Kidding, of couse.
Oof, the description of female circumcision makes me wince at just the thought. (And so does the word smegma.) I suppose that's how some of you guys may feel towards male circumcision, although as far as I know, there aren't as many negative side effects. Sure, you may lose some sensitivity, but you don't experience
pain during sex.
However, I have heard that it can lead to increased chances of premature ejaculation... Is that true? I would almost think that if those that still have more sensitivity with the foreskin would have the increased chance.
On a side (and vain) note, I agree that uncircumcised penises look like wobbles, whatever those things are.