:
|
I thought Sideways was good. Paul Giamatti is amazingly depressing to watch, but he's an excellent actor. And what was so low-budget about it?
|
Sideways was SHIT.
It was a film. With two guys. And nothing much happened. It was boring. My day to day life is more interesting than anything that happened in that film. Why would I want to go see a film that's so boring that I can get more entertainment from just living normally? Watching it was a total waste of my time.
It was about as entertaining as sitting in a cinema for a couple hours while watching two guys do nothing in particular could possibly be. It compares to watching paint dry while waiting for a bus in a freshly painted bus shelter. I could go on, but I think you get the point.
You can tell it was a low budget film because they only hired a few actors, the rest were extras. They didn't use any sets (they cost too much money), the just used a bunch of reasonably attractive locations, and all the action was really cheap/easily shot.
The end.