That is to assume that God exists. Not everyone believes in God, and everyone has a right to freely choose their religion without having any one religion be imposed upon them. In short, human rights issues are not and should not be affected by any religion. Opinions on Euthenasia are only ever heard from Christianity, never any of the other religions, and this is because Christians tend to believe that everyone should just accept their religion as fact, and that any act that isn't Christian should be outlawed.
Nobody is to say that God is the one who decided to make her not recover, and therefore make it wrong to keep her alive and defy God. I'm not quite sure how to articulate this, but what I'm generally trying to say is, that religions shouldn't be a factor in deciding whether she lives or dies. Why should christianity be the deciding religion? Why not some strange tribal religion from deep within a jungle settlement somewhere?
No religion is accepted fact. In essence, religion is all partisan screed - as meaningful and relevant as it is to the individual, it's worthless and useless, and in cases like this unhelpful, to others who do not believe in or agree with it. If the woman is Christian, then she should be treated as her religion requires, but if she isn't then for the sake of sanity, stop trying to impose your beliefs and essentially take someone's life in the name of your God. It's not right.
|