:
|
supermunch, you cannot define someone's life with your own views on purpose.
|
I'm not defining life by my opinion, but simply stating my opinion. You can agree or disagree.
:
|
and the spontaneous generation theory is so ridiculous, it's amazing.
|
Yes, it was rather stupid, yes. But then again, we do not know how we got here for sure...
:
|
this is akin to saying that if a burrito's purpose is unknown and is to be eaten, but does not get eaten, that being eaten was its purpose.
|
But isn't the point of a burritos existence to be eaten? I mean, what other choice does it have except 'not be eaten'? Then again, burritos are more sentient than some forum users...
:
you say that that person's life is pointless because they did not propagate.
why? in what sense?
|
I'm not saying it is completely pointless, as I said that your view previously stated on life was true. I'm just saying, it is pretty much 50-50. The person life may not be pointless, but their sex life/ non-sex life was... Not to mention their previous kin's persistence to breed.
Wow, we have sort of trod off the topic of "Children dating"... Who thinks it's moral, or immoral? Myself, I think it is immoral, for previously stated reaons, many of which were not stated my moi. Anyway, I think it is just stupid and obviously peer-pressure induced.