I concocted a really long winded polite reply to Majics' statements, and everyone else who was randomly supporting him as though I had committed some kind of moral atrocity against him by refusing to respond to his baseless argument, but I decided there was really very little point when all I needed to say was this:
:
|
In the modern British legal system, and many others, for that matter, the Bible is entirely significant. I'm not much of a political expert, but it doesn't take a degree to realize there is a great deal of influence that has come out of the book. Many politicians nowadays are Christian, many politicians decades ago were Christians, and so on. Moral principles are learned, passed down, and suggested towards others. I can't think of a way to clearly describe the idea, but whether you accept it or not, much of society's moral foundations intertwine with biblical influence, though not remaining confined to direct derivatives.
|
Prove it. Get a British law and prove it. Quote historical archives and facts about British law and prove your point.
Otherwise, leave it alone and quit wasting my time with your futile arguments.
That's all I needed to say, but it's not all I want to say. Y'know, it really irritates me when people act like they're the expert on everything, and then later claim that knowing what they're talking about is merely a minuscule and irrelevant detail which they can omit at their leisure without harming the credibility of their argument. Believe me, you are at NO risk of harming the credibility of your argument, your argument already has zero credibility.
You know how your argument comes off to me Majic? Well, in case you don't, I'll demonstrate it for you:
:
|
In the modern British legal system which I know nothing about, and many others, which I also know nothing about for that matter, the Bible is entirely significant because I say so. I'm not much of a political expert, but it doesn't take a degree to realise there is a great deal of influence that has come out of the book - you can realise this by reading what I say, you don't actually need to "know" anything. Many politicians nowadays are Christian because I said so, and many politicians decades ago were Christians, and so on. Not necessarily because I looked up the history of politics, but more because I said so. Moral principles are learned, passed down, and suggested towards others. This is proven by the fact that I said so. I can't think of a way to clearly describe the idea, but whether you accept it or not, much of society's moral foundations intertwine with biblical influence, though not remaining confined to direct derivatives. Of course, not because I've actually researched it, but merely just because I said so.
|
Yeah, ok let's all just nod in agreement. Majic must be right because he doesn't know what he's talking about, and anybody who doesn't know what they're talking about MUST be right. That makes perfect sense. I mean, look at George Bush - he doesn't know what he's talking about, and he can run the USA!
You know what? I don't even want to say all this because I know I'll get flak for it, but frankly I'm fed up with holding back from kicking idiots like you in the gonads. You deserve every last little ounce of humiliation you get for being a complete and utter prick. Get your big head out of your curryhole. You don't know everything, and claiming that you don't doesn't make your point more valid. I'm not going to exercise any restraint on you just because you're a mod, and I'm not going to play nice, because I'm fed up with being pissed on by morons who don't even read the posts I go to so much trouble to create.