:
|
I'm not even sure whether I should bother to attempt to respond to this, it's so far off from the debate that it's just funny.
|
You stated, "Religion has nothing to do with the modern legal system in Britain."
I stated, "In the modern British legal system, and many others, for that matter, the Bible is entirely significant."
Note the title of the topic,
Laws, and the Bible.
I'm pretty sure the defense of my stance opposing yours entirely relevant to the topic. Also, my lack of knowledge regarding British law is not a necessary aspect in my argument. Thus, your comments putting down my opinion due to that lack of knowledge is beside the point. Yes, if I was trying to say British law is derived from the Bible, I'd look like a fool. Key word being "if".
Note that I'm trying to say that religion (more specifically, the Bible) has a great influence on the populous, and the populous has a great influence on regional politics, therefore religion has a significant, yet indirect, affect on politics. Even in modern times. This seems to cover all aspects of opposition towards you comment quoted above. The only way I see my comments being off topic, is if yours were too.