[Nepharski]

You're right when you define homosexuality as a lust. You just forgot to mention that heterosexuality is also a lust. Whilst sex can and should be an expression of love, it's impossible to extricate the lust from it. Where you are wrong is in saying that gay people can't experience love like straight people can. This is profound ignorance on your part and shows a lack of ability to see things from someone else's perspective.

And where, exactly, did I say such a thing? I do not recal ever reciting such information. I would, however, like to state that lust and love are similar enough that some might get the aforementioned...emotions mixed. I never proclaimed that Homosexuals cannot experiance love...but I do feel that they are not, in reality, actually experiencing love between themselves...though they may lable it so. Still, you are in possession of a view which merits further studies and conversations relating with it.

...And kindly refrain from insulting me for proclaiming an opposing viewpoint. I do, in fact, see things from other perspectives.

I assume that you are referring to the New Testament. If that is correct then I must point out that the different authors contradict themselves frequently. I'm not a scholar so I can't give actual references but the different gospels offer quite different versions of the various events. In particular, the ones that were written chronologically later ascribe much higher levels of divinity to Jesus as well as very different versions of his crucifiction.

Yes, I am aware that the authors of the Gospels all proclaim different views, but the message, ideals, concepts, beliefs, etc...they never vary. Sitll, I must request validation of your claim of contradiction. Thank you for your time.