The only problem I'm seeing is that we actually have a system. Let me explain...
It seems to me that mods will often go on warnings alone instead of whether or not the person in question is actually a good member. If the member in question is OBVIOUSLY an annoying little twat, tell him/her to stop. If they continue, give them a temp ban. There. Simple. I never liked this "three strikes, you're out" system because it puts too much emphasis on itself. Deciding if someone is a worthy poster or not isn't such a complicated matter that it requires some grand scheme for judgment. You know if they're a good member. You just do. The number of strikes/warnings someone has is irrelevant.
We don't need a new system, when need less of the system we have now.
Heh... spoken like a true libertarian.
|