PA, you are a victim of fear. Do you really believe George W. Bush is the reason why terrorists are not invading the U.S. Just to let you know, those terror alert levels will never lower to green. You have been fed these half-truths by an administration based on scaring people. The reason there have been no terror attacks is because they very rarely ever happen. Terrorists just don't seem to attack the U.S. all that often. Besides Osama's first attack on the World Trade Centers, 9/11 was the only real terrorist attack. You do realise that George W. was the one at the head of this country when we were attacked. It's odd that a memo saying Osama bin Laden determined to attack the U.S. wouldn't raise a few eyebrows. Now terror is all we here on the news these days. You are obviously not informed that most major news networks are owned by rich republicans. They are not too keen on allowing "liberal nonsense", so that argument is dead in the water. Saddam was pushed into power by the U.S., that is a fact. Like most ruthless dictators (there sure are a lot of em in this world) they tend to treat the inhabitants harshly. Why did the U.S. bomb the shite out of Iraq? I sure as Hell hope that Bush did not send our troops into that country to be shot at and killed because of that. We already know they lied about WMD's, so lets leave that alone. So I guess Bush's next plan of actions will be to bring down all the other nasty dictators, I mean that would make sense considering his reasons for blowing up Iraq. Your apparently not one to use logic in your rantings, comparing the ideals of Hitler to those of a liberal, I would certainly like an explanation for your reasons. Now I understand your mad at Osama and his gang, but those are really the only ones we can really blame. We have no idea where they are, and the president has said that he doesn't even care about them any more. Why aren't we going after the real bad guys?
|