thread: Loch Ness...
View Single Post
  #19  
02-14-2004, 07:44 AM
Joe the Glukkon's Avatar
Joe the Glukkon
Fuzzle
 
: Feb 2004
: US
: 144
Rep Power: 22
Joe the Glukkon  (10)

Nice pictures paramiteabe.I'm not sure about that first one,it looks a little like a hoax to me.The second one (The man pointing at it) looks real.There are no seals,walrus,in Loch Ness.And that can't be a duck.A duck would be much smaller than that.

Oh yeah, and here are a couple of Bigfoot images.



The photograph shown here was taken from a still frame of a 16mm film camera. On October20, 1967, two men on horseback, Roger Patterson, who shot the film and Bob Gimlin, a friend, took to the northern Californian woods of Bluff Creek in the hopes of photographing one of these elusive creatures. They were not disappointed. In the late afternoon, Patterson and Gimlin encountered the creature. Patterson’s horse reared and knocked him to the ground. He quickly jumped up and ran toward the creature. It responded by simply walking away. Gimlin kept his friend covered with a rifle in case it attacked. It walked into the trees and vanished. The two men decided against following the creature thinking there maybe a confrontation with either it -or more of its kind that could be in the area. After it was filmed, many scientists dissected the footage. Some claim the film was indeed that of an unknown animal. Others claim it was merely a man in an obvious monkey suit.
Over the years, rumors abounded that Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin hoaxed the whole incident. It even went further by saying that a special effects man named John Chambers, who designed the makeup in the Planet of the Apes movies, designed the suit. He has denied any involvement. Movie special effects people claim the film is just a man in a suit. Some scientists still cling to their belief that the film is authentic. Sadly, Roger Patterson died in 1972 of cancer. Did he go to his grave laughing? Or did he firmly believe at the time of his death that he had seen Bigfoot? In March of 1992, Bob Gimlin admitted that he might have been fooled. He gave thought to the possibility that Roger concocted the whole thing and Bob was an unknowing eyewitness to one of the most elaborate hoaxes in the world.




This photo is one of several taken July 11, 1995 by an off-duty forest patrol officer in the Wild Creek area near Mt. Rainier. It is one of 7 other photos purchased from the officer by Bigfoot investigator Cliff Crook. The ranger was following up a lead on bear poachers in the area when he heard loud splashing sounds below him. He peeked over the ridge to investigate with camera in hand. Some of the photos are shaded and others are of excellent clarity.
"No matter how convincing supposed Bigfoot photos or films may be, until the ultimate living proof is in, alleged Bigfoot photos and films must remain alleged. Only the true test of time will tell." - Cliff Crook




This is a picture of a white Bigfoot like creature sighted often in Fort Worth, Texas in 1969.



This photo was taken in 1997 by a fire fighter captain on the edge of the Florida Everglades. This bigfoot relative is known as the Skunkape in the Florida area. The Skunkape has been sighted numerous times and there have also been footprints found and cast. It gets it's nickname from the power stench that often accompanies it. Reported sightings of this creature go back 30 years.
__________________
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...cg_banner1.jpg
Joe the Glukkon,
how sad are you,
when you don't have,
a Soul Storm Brew!

Reply With Quote