well....*takes deep breath*
my theories are based on the conversation they would have.
if the one who didn't know everything had a conversation with the one who knows everything the mood of the conversation (if at all) depends. If the one who didn't know everything didn't know he the other knew everything, then he probly wouldn't ask. But the one who knows everything may say a fair warning to the other and the other would probly be glad, and would mention he knew something would happen, thus the conversation could be pleasant. but, if he didn't say anything to the other guy, then the war would ensue, and there probly wouldn't be conversation at all, but if during the war he said he knew everything the other would probly be mad and the conversation would be a quite negative (that is if either of them were alive). But Then theis the possibility of the one who doesn't know everything speaking first which also effects a conversation they could or would have; the other one would mostly likely say "i know", but the way he responds (if at all) could also effect the conversation. But that doesn't matter. If neither of them spoke then the war would ensue and they would probly both die, But i see them being could people and trying to prevent anyone from dying so it could happen a few ways. The one who knows everything may not know the other one knew something, but knew he would say something, thus he asks "what are you going to say" and the way he answers could also effect the conversation, but the one who knows everything not knowing something is unlikely because he knows everything. So i conclude that the conversation has many ways of changing and can greatly effect what happens to either of them if the war starts or not.
*collapses and gasps for breath*
|