CG's ramblins
AHEM... forgive me for contradicting the FORUM FOUNDER (who I have not seen before) but... that is a claim relating to events before the war made with facts from after the war.
For example, Bush starts the war on Iraq saying that Saddam had WoMD. Ok, now that has since been proven to be incorrect. Saddam DIDN'T have WoMD. However, if you notice, I used the words "since been proven". When the war started, nobody said there were no WoMD. Only after the war did we KNOW that there were no WoMD. So could it be possible that Bush started the war either because his information was incorrect (but he thought it was correct and therefore felt so very very very sure of his accusations?
And how do we know for SURE that he lied to the world? Maybe he was so confident that he was right that he made his statements to the world.
Now all of that makes it sound like I'm supporting bush. Honestly though, I really dislike him. He is inept as you said, he is stupid, and he is above all wrong... plus, he isn't man enough to admit he was wrong. Now a leader who can stand up and admit to the world that he was completely wrong is a leader worthy of praise.
|