Another valid point. It may border on the level of conspiracy. But there are too many little things that dont add up. If we were there to liberate Iraq why didnt we do that 11 years ago in the first Gulf War? Why didnt we take out Saddam then, when we had a lot more support than this simple so called "Coalition" of just basically the United States and Great Britain?
Of course there are other reasons, but its so obvious that Bush is after more than just freeing the people of Iraq.
I might have had another opinion at this time if all the evidence provided to start this war was true, but when there hasnt been a single weapon of mass destruction (still a relief) whether or not the Iraqi military hid them, or not. Starting a war with false information is totally wrong in my books.
|