:
|
Science is quickly catching up to religion, and beliefs of religion are being found to be false. What will happen when science over takes religion, and everything the Bible speaks of has been found to be totally false?
|
I would just like to come out and say this. NOTHING in the Bible can be proven false scientifically. The only thing that "contradicts" science are miracles and such where the Bible says it is God actually doing the work, in which case it doesn't have to agree with physical science. There is actually a wealth of physical evidence that at least some of the events in the Bible were real. The discovery of the ark is only a small (and old) piece of all the physical, see-it-with-your-own-eyes evidence.
Evolution on the other hand, can be scientifically proven to have never occured on the earth. I can try to back that up with hard scientific evidence, but it is such a large topic I really don't want to waste time unless any of you honestly want to learn why evolution is false so that you can tell it to your science teachers or something.
:
|
I frown upon any type of denomination more so than the prehistoric Catholicism. I will admit that Catholicism is the true Christian religion. Any denominations were started out of greed. One perfect example is the Lower Church of England.
|
Catholicism is NOT the true Christian religion. It is a denomination, based on the original church, but with many man made additions. First off, where did the name come from? In the Bible the Christians are always refered to as the Church of Christ. Never in the Bible do we read the name "Catholic", so obviously it is a man made name for a man made religion. The catholic church doesn't even follow the Bible completely. The true Christian religion was the churches founded by the apostles and the churches today who still follow that example as close as they can. Catholicism adds a lot of ceremonial stuff to Christianity that isn't in the scriptures.
And OldAndNotSoTasty. Nobody, as far as I know, said a gay person or a heroin addict couldn't have a great personality. So what was the point of that. Nobody said that a person is a bad person just because of their actions. Nobody is perfect and everyone agrees with that. Except maybe Jacob, who probably thinks he is perfect.
Oh and PA. No offense, but wouldn't trying to disprove evolution be a lot funner than talking about cloning? I did a huge position paper on cloning and it is really not that interesting a subject in my opinion.