Washington Sniper
 

I've think that everyone have heard of the Washington sniper. Today on the news, i heard that they have caught the man behind the innocent killing. He was caught at 4:30am with his step son and a sniper rifle at the back of the car. They were sleeping. The man was in the army before. I think my news would be wrong since i heard only a bit of it before i lefted school. Can anyone add more details.

Yea your right they did catch him. Do you think this Sniper was Terrorist related. Could have he been working for Bin Ladden? I suspect it.

I heard that he was muslim or something like that. I dont think he is working for terrorist though. Did they actually confirm that it was him. I think that religion is a really dangerous thing. It started alot of wars like the crusades in the medieval age.

It's not religion that's the problem, it's the idiots who can't use it properly.

I doubt the man's religion had much to do with this. I believe that he was a more a armed gun fanatic that just happened to be muslim. And if it was confirmed to be him, i hope they fry him in the chair.

They were not working for any terrorist organization. You're paranoid if you think they are. From what I heard on the news, the sniper was a Jamacian-American father and son. Or was it step-son? Oh well, there were two of them, and they were not working for Osama, let's leave it at that.

i think that no matter how bad a person did, they should never be fryed in a chair.

happyguy,Your an idiot...

People are entitled to their opinions VykerSawBones, theres no need to express your opinion in such a spammy type message. Explain it better next time, instead of just calling them names.

I also share the same thoughts as happyguy936, no matter what they've done, no one should be killed for it. A life sentence should be enough, but anyway, I thought the "chair" was only enforced in certain states. I thought Wasington was one of the states that didn't enforce it. Then again, I know hardly anything about America compared to Americans...naturally :D

Alcar...

I think that if a criminal has the knowledge they will be executed for their crime, they will be all the more likely to do more appaling things because of it, a kind of venegance for their death when it comes.
Of cource that was me rambling my confused thoughts onto the forums again...Does it make sense?

I don't know how they enforce the death penalty there, I was just making a point. This person killed quite a few people to show what a good shot he was, that is sick and twisted and it deserves whatever necessary!

And for every sick bastard that gets a life sentence, thats more tax dollars going down the drain to pay for their cable television. Personally, I think we should enforce the death penalty by at least 10 times the normal rate and be less lenient on people whom enjoy the deaths of others. And prison shouldn't be as comforatable as they make it, these people (murderers, rapists, child molesterers) are scum and the worst that this planet can offer and I think we should kill all of them mercilessly.

Ah, I remember Ms Sewac's touching little speech.

They were no relation, they just introduced each other as "Step-son/dad.".
They were not working for Osama.
They weren't religious.
They did dislike America.
They were immensly clever.

Basically i dont think they should be put to death, just because it shows up America doesn't mean they should die for it. It gave me some light entertainment and a reason to watch the news. For that they should live.

If the crime was alot worse though like something to do with raping thousands of children they should be burned.

You also said that the 9/11 attack wasn't genius.

Thats what i think. Every year we have a Fair sorta thing were aload of gypsies come and grace us with rides. As you walk down the street there is row upon row of preachers...i usually get them riled with a little:

"So, whats your view on homosexuality?"

Then follow that through with some cleverly insulting remarks before stating that if you look at the back of the bible, at the bottom, it is clearly stated that:

"All characters and locations in this book are purely fictional and are not intended to be taken seriously under any means."

Or, if im tired i'd just walk past and say:

"Too gay to pray."

I'll put my out look on this simply:

What gives anyone the right to kill another person?

Alcar...

If that persons attacking you.
If that person molests a child.
If that person is a wanker.
If that person is a Nazi supremist.

Otherwise none.

Oh, and also if that person is a Christian who believes in EVERYTHING in the Bible...which is fake.

No one has the right to decide anothers death, if someone was to attack me, and he/she died it would be out of self defence, and I would't have meant for hem to die...They might just have accidentally fell down a well.

Alcar...

There is abosulately no reason for any person to have the right to kill anybody else. Anyways, i reckon life sentence is worse then death sentence.

I believe that too, it gives the person SO much time to think about what they've done.

Alcar...

OooooK;

(1) - Paedophiles tend to get put in a certain part of a prison in which they are with other f*cks who have molested children. Anyways, they then tend to exchange stories and fantasise. That or plan another attack on a child. For this they should be killed as they are lower than the poor, ugly and rapists.

(2) - In some cases death is the 'easy way out' but since the likelyhood of using the c*nts for experimental use (Medicines, cosmetics etc) is out of the question its the only other sensible answer.

(3) - Happyguy, you obviously haven't lived in the 'real world' long enough to know what im talking about. If you are older then me i suggest you actually venture outside once in a while.

(4) - Alcar, if a person attacked you and you were cornered you would most likely do them some serious damage. Its in our genes, if somebody see's fit to attack me, and i get the upper hand, i would make damn certain they didn't get up and come after me. (I've never got that, in horror movies they knock down the bad guy and then run, why dont they stamp on his head or kick his ballz!?)

You're being paranoid. The two guys were working alone. Bin Laden wouldn't do something so small as to set two amature snipers loose in Washington. Only six civillans died, why would he care about that?

Um, no I am not paranoid I was just seeing if anybody thought so. Because doesent he like to kill people?

As for the death penalty well thats as old as history its self. Its all humen nature you can't fix it. We can say what ever we want and nothing will change. We will still be liveing in this same old place forever. It's great to be humen eh?:smokin:

What gave that sniper the right to kill all of those innocent people.
To a certain extent, the atrocities commited by those who feel it necessary to prey on the innocent should be paid for in the criminals blood.
And do you actually think murderers and rapists sit in jail and think about what a bad thing they've done? NO! They sit in there and the brag about what they've done!
Prison is a school for these people, and they should be shown the same amount of mercy for the people they killed!

And DON'T even begin to lecture me with a bunch of liberal bull sh*t!

They were immensly clever.
Yeah, simply oozing with intelligence. I wish I was that brainy.

What gave that sniper the right to kill all of those innocent people.
Nothing - that's why they were arrested. Duh!

And do you actually think murderers and rapists sit in jail and think about what a bad thing they've done?
Some of them do.

They sit in there and the brag about what they've done!
Had first hand experience have you?

Prison is a school for these people, and they should be shown the same amount of mercy for the people they killed!
I forgot two wrongs make a right.

And DON'T even begin to lecture me with a bunch of liberal bull sh*t!
Sorry.


(1) - Paedophiles tend to get put in a certain part of a prison in which they are with other f*cks who have molested children. Anyways, they then tend to exchange stories and fantasise. That or plan another attack on a child. For this they should be killed as they are lower than the poor, ugly and rapists.
They actually tend to be released into an undisclosed location so that News of the World can "Name and Shame".

If that persons attacking you.
Oh, then it's okay to murder them.

If that person molests a child.
If they molest an adult that's okay then.

If that person is a wanker.
That cuts down the world's population considerably.. I wonder - have you NEVER masturbated before then?

If that person is a Nazi supremist.
Oh yeah, GREAT reason to murder 'em.

Otherwise none.
Narrow minded prick.

Oh, and also if that person is a Christian who believes in EVERYTHING in the Bible...which is fake.
Another super reason. We should send off this excellently compiled list to lay down strict guidlines as to the laws of execution.

They made their car into a death machine (As the papers called it) i would say that was quite clever, since they left no evidence behind whatsoever.

Well, just remember next time...

Are you from England? Cos some of them get put in a secure area over here...And what do you think about the naming and shaming thing, do you believe it is right?

If they're going to kill you, yes...I would anyway.

An adult can defend his or herself. A child (Say of the age of 1 month) is innocent and anyone who has done such a thing to a child should be beaten joyfully...with singing...and a choir. Adults can tell people children are fearful of their attackers.

I quite 2 months ago...Vile habit, makes you go blind.

I'm glad we're on the same wave length...

No your not, you just have different views...

You have to take it abit too far dont you...

Nah... that's just a myth... heh heh... right? :D

Not when it gets in your eye...

They made their car into a death machine (As the papers called it) i would say that was quite clever, since they left no evidence behind whatsoever.
Except giant holes in the side. Anyone could have thought up such a plan.

Well, just remember next time...
As always.


Are you from England? Cos some of them get put in a secure area over here...And what do you think about the naming and shaming thing, do you believe it is right?
Yes. No.

If they're going to kill you, yes...I would anyway.
Attacking you doesn't mean they're gonna kill you. we had a debate about this in english.

An adult can defend his or herself. A child (Say of the age of 1 month) is innocent and anyone who has done such a thing to a child should be beaten joyfully...with singing...and a choir. Adults can tell people children are fearful of their attackers.
But it's okay to rape an 80 year old woman. Yep, she can sure defend herself. And only kids are fearful of attackers? You naive fucker.

I quite 2 months ago...Vile habit, makes you go blind.
are you french?

I'm glad we're on the same wave length...
i'm not.


No your not, you just have different views...
Thanks. but you are.

You have to take it abit too far dont you...
yes.. it would be no fun otherwise.

You guys have drifted a little off-topic...

True, yet why did the Americans only catch him cos of the stupidity of them...?

Surely its a good thing, why isn't it?

True, but if you know they're going to kill you. And besides, you dont know they're not going to kill you...so, why take a chance?

Where did i say that? And even if she couldn't, she would still tell somebody. A child wouldn't cos the person who raped him/her would threaten them and scare them with such things as;

"You tell, i will get your sister/brother..."

Or something like that.

I never said ONLY kids...But;

(1) - If that kid cant speak due to its age, then, it cant tell anyone and it will be fearful.

(2) - The person can scare them into not telling and/or make them think the occurances are normal...

Im a mixture of nationalities...

Ok...?

Sure...? And my narrow mindedness is where...? And how...? And why...?

Quite...(Thats quite and not quiet.)