Saddam Hussein
A "hot topic" in politics now is "Should America persecute Saddam Hussein. Ithink it has pros and cos. the pros are that we'd finnaly get that law-breaking, diabolical, weapon-hoarding fanatic out of the world's collective hair. We also undoubtedly have the might to trash saddam hussein.
The cons are:Saddam Hasn't attacked the U.S., and if the military would attack his government we would have no allies. Saddam also has chemical and germ warfare capabilities, and much larger army than the taliban(had). Also saddam could attack a neighboring country. So what do you think Should Dubya attack or should he stay at his ranch,I mean the White House |
I think we should leave Saddam alone right now.Sure, if we kicked his sorry ass it might solve a few problems. But at this moment in time, we should let him be. The only time we should do anything to him is if he does something to majorly provoke us.
|
:
Of course America shouldn't attack Saudi Arabia. Hussein has to be overthrown from within, or Saudi Arabia will just become another satellite state to the US... |
I don't think The US (I Live in the US ) should attack Saudi Arabia, but I still don't trust them, Do I beleive in us bombing Afghanistan, yes and no because we can't even prove that Bin Laden came up with the plotI think he was involved completely though, to destroy the World Trade Centers. I think their is a conspiracy though. Thats my Opinion.
[ December 30, 2001: Message edited by: Al the vykker ] |
Saddam Hussain is insane!
He like killed his family in order to be a leader. He reminds me of Hitler in the 21st century! |
Saddam Hussain is insane!
He like killed his family in order to be a leader. He reminds me of Hitler in the 21st century! |
I heard somewhere that genrally in middle eastern countreys if governments are pro-american then the people are anti-american and vice versa.
|