Archive or Remove old topics
To be honest I thought this system was already in place.
Topics more than a year old should be automatically locked forever. This would solve the "posting on old threads" problem, right? |
Topics more than six years old ARE locked in place, try to post in them or quote from them and you'll get a message telling you to contact an admin.
|
It's not much of a problem. It happens rarely, affects very little, and is easy to fix. And since I can't find an option for it, it most probably would require a hack that'll make updating vBulletin an even bigger pain in the arse.
|
I think topics over a week old should be deleted.
|
I think members over a week old should be deleted.
|
i think members over a week old should take a regular Common Sense test.
|
I am in favor of this.
|
I was under the impression that any topic that hasn't been posted in for 3 months is automatically locked down?
|
:
|
Clearly that doesn't prevent people from posting in them.
|
I don't recall a topic of late that was revived after six months.
|
there's been a few in FC. only ones i've noticed, and it always seems to be some hapless newbie going "OMG this is great! hope to see more! ;)". i can't stand the niceness. IT WAS OVER 3 YEARS OLD FUCK
|
|
Yeah, they get locked. I had to ask Nate reopen one for me a while ago.
|
considering this topic was made by AlexFili, who frequents FC, i would say the threads being revived there are what sparked this thread. but i think a lock on any thread in FC would be quite silly. people just need to learn how to use that thing they were born with, along with their eyes.
|
:
I don't understand. That thread isn't more than six months old, there is no message advising users not to post in it, and I can't see that this subject comes up in it. |
:
|
You don't see it because you're a mod. The message states this: You are not permitted to reply to threads older than three months. If you feel your reply is important to the thread, please contact a Moderator for guidance.
|
For the record, I didn't expect to see a message for that exact reason.
EDIT: Also, NFI what kind of guidance I could give on the matter other than "tough titties". |
:
:
As for what guidance you could give; if someone sends you a PM, you can either post in the thread to revive it, or you can tell them to create a new thread. Is that not guidance enough for you? |
The former seems stupid, but I've done it before, then deleted my post. What a rendundant amount of effort.
I also remember seeing the message, but I can't remember if that was before I became an admin. |
So you would prefer to have people create new threads rather than extend an existing one that is perfectly relevant but would take 30 seconds of your time?
|
I didn't say that in the slightest.
|
:
|
:
:
|
I know what you said. I was pointing out the contradiction therein.
|
|
So "Hang on, I'll just waltz over there, post something meaningless, then you can post and I'll delete my post" constitutes advice?
|
Well, the PM reply of "Okay, I'll fix that for you" constitutes advice.
|
Thanks for the advice.
|