Where the hell did that tank go?
Warfare goes invisible. Yay! :happy:
London, England (AHN) - The Ministry of Defense confirmed that they are testing technology they claim makes tanks and troops invisible. The highly secret trials were conducted by the Royal Engineers and scientists from specialist researchers QinetiQ, the former research arm of the MoD described the tests successful after they were able to make a vehicle seem to completely disappear. "This technology is absolutely incredible. If I hadn't been present I wouldn't have believed it," a soldier present at the trials said. "I looked across the fields and just saw grass and trees - but in reality I was staring down the barrel of a tank gun." According to the scientists, the breakthrough was made possible by using cameras and projectors to beam images captured from the surrounding landscape onto a specially-adapted tank coated with silicon to maximize their reflective qualities, resulting in the naked eye seeing only the view which is behind the tank. The technology could reach the battlefield within five years, said Professor Sir John Pendry of Imperial College London, the world's leading authority on the physics of invisibility. Aside from the tank, the British military is also testing a combat jacket working on the same principles. |
Terran Ghost anyone?
|
Smells like BS to me.
|
I call bluff, good sir!
|
It only works from one angle, though. Also, the cameras and projectors give it away :p
|
Not bluff, true story. It's been in development since 1995 actually and this tank is apparently the first prototype they have come up with. Also anyone who might have watched Die Another Day surely remembers the Aston Martin Vanquish that was able to go invisible. If you watch the directors commentary he explains that while the idea of an invisible car might seem too sci fi even for a James Bond film, the British military was actually experimenting with technology based on the same principle, probably referring to this project.
Anyway I think the term 'less visible' is more appropriate. |
All we need to do is politely ask the enemy to manoeuvre themselves into the appropriate position for the cloak to operate effectively. Being British, this should present no problem at all.
|
Considering the technology here, surely if the tank moved much it would be seen? The equipment couldn't be hidden that well, as if it was partially behind anything, the beams would get blocked, and ruin the effect. And, off course, the possible resulting cost behind this. How much will it cost?
Doesn't seem particularly practical. At the very least, at the moment. Wouldn't bother trying on the battlefield with this. You need a suit of armour that bends the light around the object, and sends it straight off, so it's almost unnoticeable. This could be improved. With better technology, we could have the cameras and light projectors that move, following the vehicle or soldiers as they move, the cameras flick through their available images of the landscape they are in as it tracks them around. However, still impractical. Verdict: Don't bother with this on the field, risking lives. Could be interesting if used in holiday parks, theme parks, whatever, in various ways. For entertainment, basically. |
I would like to see a picture of this invisible tank to prove it exists.
|
:
|
Meerly playing the fool for your entertainment sadly.
|
It could possibly work for a permanent installation like a gun turret.
|
:
|
:
God, why isn't there an ultimate genius who with a little thinking can solve complex problems at unnatural speeds? We could be in the next galaxy by now. Answer: Complete Genocide of Life on Earth. Besides, he'd be in a lab by now being tortured for information to build this and that easier by whatever government had him. |
:
http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/19/d...cloak-sort-of/ http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/r...ractive-index/ |
:
|
Heh, useful if they can perfect it.
|
It works perfectly already. Just not as effective active camouflage.
|
:
A gun turret would be found out the moment it moved or shot, then likely would get obliterated from a distance, since it can't then flee. Wouldn't think it would be worth spending money and investing into that. And if it's not moving, covering it in good camouflage would work just as well, and not nearly so expensive. |
Surely you do not believe they plan to set up a beamer and a bunch of cameras in the middle of the battlefield. The cameras and the projectors are build into the tank. What the camera sees on one side of the tank, it projects on the other and vice versa. Imagine putting a camera behind your TV and looking at the image. When positioned right it would look like your looking right through your TV.
|
It is clearly not suited to combat situations in its current form, just that doesn't mean there are no other applications.
|
Hiding cameras anyone?
|
Yeah, I mean, how hard is it to use the same clocking divice to hide the cameras clocking the tanks.
Well, it's easy once you figure how the hell you're supposed to hide the next set of cameras that are hiding the cameras, that are hiding the tank. Being English, the tanks would also need to have a full assortment of teas and biskets, which will add to the the costs and all. Nothing better than a nice cup of tea while blasting the smitherines out of everyone left right and center. Oh, and the tanks will have to be able to become invisible from birds eye view so the american plans stop bombing the sh*t out of them. |
Ah, so we will end up designing a layout in which a camera and projector are hiding another camera and projector, which in turn are hiding the aforementioned camera and projector.
While the enemy is distracted by this wanton act of redundancy, the tank, uncloaked, sneaks up and destroys them all. |
Damnit Bullet, you disclosed information that MI6 wanted to keep secret at all costs! Now they will hunt you down!
|
I dedicate my 666th post to the headline the week after this hits the battlefield.
"British forces lose Invisible Tank" |
Thats... hilarious XD.
|
A waste of money and effort, when the resources can just be spent bombing the bejesus out of the enemy.
Unless, perhaps, it could be used for recon missions. A single soldier is cloaked, and sneaks near the enemy base to get intel on forces and defences and such, while they can't see him at all. Then maybe he calls in an air strike or such. Or just snipes the leader in the head. I dunno. Like a ghost in Starcraft. Life imitates art! |
A true poet once wrote:
:
...Hey look! We've almost got this tank invisible! |
:
|