Gay-O-Meter
|
20% not gay.
|
13% gay
I prefer womans :fuzwink: |
I'm 36% gay but I had to make up the answers to most of the questions.
|
30% gay
|
43%.
|
I am 100% lady lover and 0% gay! I prefer women.:fuzblink:
|
To tired to know what Im doing at the momment.
Im 25% and...yeah, wait, no!:fuzblink:
|
Heh!
I'm 19% Gay!
I'm a totall none man lover though! I perfer women... Mudokon101... |
According to the test, I'm 63% gay. :D Hmm... in the lead with Sydney...;)
|
It says that I'm 46% gay.
My results say: Congratulations! You've scored right in the middle and are a happy and well-adjusted hetero man. Yay! I'm happy and well-adjusted! :D |
I re-took the test, simulating the answers to some of the questions.
I got 50%, yeah! |
73% Homosexual
|
25% too straight.Is that a possibility? How did these people figure out the blend of perfect gay and notgayness
|
Got a 50%
*shrugs and walks off* |
hmmm...
only 6% gay . i'm the evil souled one !!!!:fuzvamp: :fuzmad:
|
33%... They say I sould losen up, pffffft who cares. Anyways, that place is kinda stupid. The image at the left is verydisturbing to look at...
|
I'm 33% Gay,it's little comment said:
"Loosen up my straight mate! These days women like a man with some softer edges to grab onto". Ok whatever..... |
33% for me too.
Alcar... |
46% gay... hmmm :fuzconf:
Never thought of myself as particuarly gay... ah well. |
Mine said:
'Women like you dont they, but little do they know your a wolf in sheeps clothing ready to pounce.' |
"Danny is 50% Gay!
You're open-minded between the sheets and just as balanced when out on the streets!" More or less what I'd have expected... |
Whoever thought up this test should be shot. It's ridiculous.
|
40 percent
Hey, it should be 50%. *is bi, to her knowledge*
Oh well. 10% off the mark, I'm happy. *l* Two of the questions I didn't get, though. That's the only reason I think the test was a little... erf. AND I don't like having to pick extremes - like, I frequently missed a 'NEITHER' option. So there's a site for the trash. Though it IS amusing how accurate it was on me. - Neike / Tya P.S. Yea, that picture is disturbing. *l* I think it classes as art photography, though, or something of the likes. *shudder* |
Which picture do so many people find disturbing?
I went through it again and I didn't notice any distrubing pictures. Would somebody like to enlighten me? |
I don't see any animals gnawing their legs off. No disturbing pictures here.
|
I believe the picture is of the Gay guyz.
:
|
I didn't think it was accurate, but how could it be helpful?
Can you see some hick hunched over a keyboard, grunting to himself, "Thor got 5%. It say Thor want smash homos. Thor smash homos!" I don't see the usefullnes in this. I say get Fusion energy working, instead. |
Re: 40 percent
:
:
|
40% too straight...
You're a straight-laced girlie girl with just a hint of your butch side sometimes popping out. Alright... |
You see? It even insulted Silversnow! She didn't make fun of the test's mother. Now it's telling her that she likes to flannel lumberjack shirts and wear her hair in a short, horrid fashion. How rude.
|
according to the Gay-o-meter I'm 45% gay.And I'm 55% normal.
|
Nomal?
I don't think the test is entirely accurate. It assumes that femininity equals homosexuality. And I don't see anything disturbing about the images on the page, either. |
Wait. I remember. Do you recall at the beginning of the quiz, at the opening page, it had all those naked people? I think that's what they're talking about. Take note, I'm not entirely sure.
|
:
:
:
:
|
Re: Re: 40 percent
:
Now the amount of (out) non-hetrosexuals on this forum has increased by 50% |
:
|
Does it? 73% is quite feminine and yet it still says im straight.
|
:
|
You know that loading screen just before you get to see your results? I totally freaked when it kept going and didn't stop until it was at 100%. :blush: :lol:
26% Gay. "Loosen up my straight mate! These days women like a man with softer edges to grab ontoè" Except the è was capital. I think it was just a typo. Somehow....I feel vaguely violated. I *kinda* hope that it's accurate, but the fact that it might be eratically wrong somewhat frightens me. |