Oddworld Forums

Oddworld Forums (http://www.oddworldforums.net/index.php)
-   Oddworld Discussion (http://www.oddworldforums.net/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   JAW Devs Waffle On And Are Confusing (http://www.oddworldforums.net/showthread.php?t=21436)

Nate 11-22-2013 06:50 PM

JAW Devs Waffle On And Are Confusing
 
http://www.oddworld.com/2013/11/new-...-roundtable-1/

Matters discussed:
  • Whether NnT will have a level editor.
  • Whether NnT will have a competitive co-op mode.
  • Whether NnT will have the same multiplayer mode as the original AO.
  • Whether NnT will have a mode in which the second player can help out without actually playing Abe.

Matters resolved to the point where I understood whether they were actually in the game or not:
  • NnT will have the same multiplayer mode as the original AO. I think.

Slog Bait 11-22-2013 07:01 PM

That's really the only thing I got out of reading that, too.

Jordan 11-23-2013 03:18 AM

I can't tell if they were intentionally being confusing or they went off on some weird tangent. What's so great about level editors anyway?

Manco 11-23-2013 03:26 AM

I think the conclusion was that they wouldn't be adding a level editor because it's too complex, and also that the co-op stuff was just some early ideas that won't be in the final game.

Xavier 11-23-2013 03:50 AM

I liked the fact it was a raw discussion of people involved in the decision making. Now I agree it would be even better if we could have some clearer idea of what the final decision is.

Or perhaps that's the point... show to people they don't even know themselves and that it could even change.

Manco 11-23-2013 03:59 AM

Nah, they’re just being British.

Havoc 11-23-2013 07:40 AM

It was a really long piece of text summing up a dozen awesome implementations of a level editor only to go 'but we're not doing any of this...' halfway through the blog.

I mean... what's the point of telling us about stuff you know you're not doing?

Manco 11-23-2013 08:20 AM

What about the parts where they shoot down every idea because of various complications or limitations? They didn’t just go “oh this would be cool but nahhh”.

AvengingGibbons 11-23-2013 09:45 AM

If they do do the classic co-op mode, they must make it switch off-and-on'able in the pause menu. I remember starting games in co-op, then trying to do more of it on my own... Have to keep switching controllers -_-...

MeechMunchie 11-23-2013 01:35 PM

:

()
Nah, they’re just being British.

Since when was Lorne British?

Oddey 11-23-2013 02:04 PM

Lorne is not. JAW is a British based company as far as I'm aware.

MeechMunchie 11-23-2013 02:44 PM

j/k

Nate 11-23-2013 05:18 PM

If JAW want to do more roundtables like this, I'd suggest they record them and post as Youtube videos. Back-and-forth discussions just don't work when transcribed.

squeak117 11-23-2013 08:53 PM

While it looks like just about everything they talked about isn't going to be in the game, I think challenge levels would have been an excellent idea. Or at least, challenge modes that, rather than changing the core game that they're determined not to change, just adding an extra element of replay-ability.

Based on the speedrun leaderboards in Stranger's Wrath HD, I'm going to guess they have something like that planned for N'n'T.

Fred The Fuzzle 11-24-2013 01:27 AM

The emphasis on revealing the challenges of game design makes me think it's all just a soft justification of not adding features.

Scrabaniac 11-24-2013 05:35 AM

I don't even think Multiplayer would have to change the level designs at all, I mean, if one plays as Abe and another controls the Mudokons, All player 2 needs to do is answer 'Ok' to follow and start playing or 'No' to ignore. Player 2 wouldn't be able to jump or roll just as usual. I don't think anything would have to be changed, I think it would just add more tension as you're relying on each other to complete a puzzle!

STM 11-25-2013 12:57 AM

Just sounds like Player one gets all the fun and Player two has to follow and do what he's told...no one with an ounce of self respect is gonna want to be Player two.

AvengingGibbons 11-25-2013 03:52 AM

You could make it like Little Big Planet so either Abe (player 1) or Mudokon (player 2) is in control depending on whoever is infront. If the player lagging behind goes offscreen, then that player dies (if it's Abe who dies, you respawn. If it's the Mudokon who dies, Abe could continue on alone, possibly met by a 2player-requiring passage, in which case he'd have to kill himself and restart the puzzle).

Paul 11-25-2013 04:24 AM

Those coop idea sound like they'd make for really frustrating game play :/ I'm glad it will be dropped.

Also if they had a level editor I assume it would have to work "in game" otherwise how would you get your custom levels on a console? That would be a huge amount of effort to implement unless they severely handicapped what it can do.

Xavier 11-25-2013 04:27 AM

Yeah, makes you wonder why JAW tought it would require a change in the level designs.
*Ahem*

Crashpunk 11-25-2013 05:27 AM

I guess adding in the co-op was just to make it like original. But did anyone really enjoy the 'co-op' in Abe's Oddysee to begin with?

Vyrien 11-25-2013 05:36 AM

I used to play it with my little brother, it was no fun for him because I often went half an hour or so with no deaths but he wasn't as good and would die every few minutes.

Co-Op really needs to be enjoyable for both players if it is implemented.

DarkHoodness 11-25-2013 05:47 AM

It's like the classic "level or life" way for more than one person to enjoy any single player game, except the game has a pointless screen which tells you whose turn it is and doesn't offer any other multiplayer feature apart from that. May as well not be there at all, IMO.

E: In fact that probably doesn't really count as being "multiplayer", so to speak. When I did PS1 Abe's Exodduss with Alector and PS1 Abe's Oddysee with Middlesboogie (old OWF veterans who no-one remembers) level or life style for fun, we didn't bother with 2 player mode.

It'd be nice to see an add-on or a whole game dedicated to a co-op campaign, with specially designed levels for it, like Portal 2's multiplayer. Although there's a lot I'd rather JAW worked on first. Like AE HD. Or probably Sligstorm.

E2: What was fun was two people playing a copy of the game at the same time in the same room (had to be on the same platform, otherwise it wasn't fair) and racing head to head to see who could beat the game first. :)

Xavier 11-25-2013 06:02 AM

Hey I remember them!

To be fair there was more then one screen coming up saying whose turn it is. If I remember correctly it was also giving the lead to the appropriate controller.

DarkHoodness 11-25-2013 06:06 AM

Oh yeah I forgot about that. But all that does is bypass the action of physically passing the controller to each other.

E: If the original "multiplayer" was done online (turns have to end between level segments though, not just on death - One person watches remotely when it's the others' turn, implement voice and text chat features) it'd be a bit less pointless. And also you'd be able to advertise that as being multiplayer without really lying to people, too. :)

Wil 11-25-2013 06:40 AM

:

()
I guess adding in the co-op was just to make it like original. But did anyone really enjoy the 'co-op' in Abe's Oddysee to begin with?

From TFA:
:

Craig: Lorne [Lanning] told me that parents and kids tended to like this mode in the original game.

STM 11-25-2013 08:36 AM

I actually really did like the old 'pass the controller' style. I used to go quite a while without dying so I'd just give my brother my turn and then let him continue when he died. The game is as fun as you make it that way. I don't see what the fuss is about.

El Dango AGAIN 11-25-2013 11:45 AM

Actual multiplayer for Abe's Oddysee is just going to feel tacked on, and I see no need for it. Waiting turns? Might be fun, even though it wouldn't really need to be an extra mode.

I made a comment on the site asking about opinions on easter eggs and in-game rewards. That kind of stuff seems more doable.

Slog Bait 11-25-2013 11:55 AM

Waiting turns is only really fun if neither player has actually played the game before.

DarkHoodness 11-25-2013 12:43 PM

Doesn't the same apply to P2's co-op mode?

Crashpunk 11-25-2013 01:59 PM

:

Craig: Lorne [Lanning] told me that parents and kids tended to like this mode in the original game.
Okay yeah, that makes sense. I just thought it was generally disliked.

I remember enjoying just passing the controller over to my dad in the normal mode. We liked to work together to complete a section rather than each of us doing different sections. Team work!

Xavier 11-26-2013 03:00 AM

:

()
E: If the original "multiplayer" was done online (turns have to end between level segments though, not just on death - One person watches remotely when it's the others' turn, implement voice and text chat features) it'd be a bit less pointless. And also you'd be able to advertise that as being multiplayer without really lying to people, too. :)

Yeah, but people will still feel lied to anyway, this is not at all what you expect when you see a game is "multiplayer".

Bullet Magnet 11-26-2013 10:41 PM

I tended to find the experience inefficient. I'd usually be alive for ages before I died, and on my brother's turn he'd immediately explode.

So when my little brother eagerly took me up on the offer to play with me the first time we got it out of the box, I made a lot of progress the first time I played the game, and be unwilling to start over. But my brother would get disheartened and leave, and for the rest of my original playthrough I'd have to switch controller every time I died. This happened in both games.

Scrabaniac 11-29-2013 04:42 AM

Put a countdown timer on it, when it runs out Abe dies. Boom. Player 2s turn.

El Dango AGAIN 11-29-2013 06:09 AM

The problem with waiting turns in the Abe games is that the game isn't really split into traditional 'levels', like in a lot of other games. In Super Mario World, it changes every time a player either dies or completes a level, but with Abe, there is no notable 'victory' state that makes for a good point to switch players, so all that is left is death, which means controller swapping happens way less often if one or both players are good at the game.

OddYouko 12-04-2013 07:21 PM

The idea of both Abe and a Mudokon (Player 2) working together on the same screen sounds pretty cool. Kinda like in Little Big Planet, if Player 2 were done playing all they'd have to do was "sign off" or something, but the Abe player could continue on. But then again, having another Mudokon join Abe would kinda defeat Abe's purpose of being "the savior of the Mudokons", right?

I dunno.
In the original I never really played co-op with my dad. All I ever remember with the co-op is when my older sister came over for a visit and wanted to play it. However, two minutes into the first level she just got up and left the room; it was obvious I was going to take a good while until I died.

STM 12-05-2013 02:19 AM

None of you guys were taught how to share, were you?

Vyrien 12-05-2013 02:43 AM

God STM, just because you are so much better than the rest of us filthy selfish peasants.

Bullet Magnet 12-05-2013 03:09 AM

Goddamn impeccable Christian upbringing. Just because the rest of us were dragged up by miserable heathens, it doesn't mean you get to rub it in our faces.

STM 12-05-2013 03:12 AM

Hey, I was trying to be subtle, you're the ones who spelt it out.