Why is homosexuality accepted before other fetishes
 

I don't get it. If people are accepting gays, why aren't they accepting other fetishists? Pedophiles and zoophiles are universally hated, coprophiles and sadomasochists are considered weird and creepy, etc. But homosexuality is accepted. Why are people still so prejudiced? They are just accepting the most popular fetishes while forgetting about all the people whose fetishes are less peculiar. I don't get.

I think that zoophiles and pedophiles are more peculiar than homosexuals. Just saying.

The only 'fetish' which I don't agreee with, which isn't even a fetish, is Pedophilia. Pedophilia is a mental illness.


Everything else goes under 'Your kink is not my kink, but it's ok'.. as long as whoever is involved consented.

Jesus, if paedophilia is a fetish then they're troubled people, as it is, all paedophiles deserved a ten minute break behind the chemical sheds.

I think homosexuality is well, my opinion isn't important but I think so many people carry an opinion that it is wrong is down to religion and that well, people don't like the idea of men shoving their cocks up other guys arse holes. To be blunt. I don't mind that much but I think its best kept to themselves.

Yet lesbians are hot.


I never understood why gay guys should be shunned, while lesbians are more widely accepted.

But then again, its probably because guys are more visually stimulated and yada yada. I don't know.

Either way, its no ones business if a guy likes to stick it in another guy. If they like it, just dont look. Unless you're a voyeur.

I agree, I hold lesbianism in pretty low standings as well, I don't really touch the stuff with a stick much.

Homosexuality isn't a fetish. It's a genetic disorder, and it's generally accepted because it generally isn't harmful to anybody.

I can't see how this applies to homosexuality without also applying to heterosexuality. The word doesn't appear to apply to sexualities at all.

But still, homosexuality and other "abnormal" fetishes, ie pedophilia, zoophilia, etc. are all disorders. So why do people accept some but not others?

Again, homosexuality isn't a fetish. Fetishes are components of homosexuality, but the same applies to heterosexuality (as Bullet Magnet pointed out). A person's sexual orientation is dependent on the development of their genes, not on an odd psychological "turn-on".
People are tolerant of things that generally do not harm anyone, very much like homosexuality. Paedophilia, zoophilia and the likes are harmful to someone/something to some degree, hence it is necessary to make people affected by those things refrain from acting on their urges.

I just explained that it's not a fetish, and your immediate response is plough on in that vein regardless.

Perhaps you would like to have a go at "disorder" yourself, or it's synonym "disease". We'll wait.

That doesn't answer my question.
Homosexuality is irregular.
So are the fetishes I listed.

Homosexuality is irregular, you're right. So are the fetishes you listed, certainly. But I did answer your question, which was:
To which I replied,
EDIT: I apologise to Bullet Magnet - I didn't realise he'd posted.

Yes, but homosexuality is two wo/men having consented sex together. Why would a child or a fucking rhino agree to have sex with a wo/man. They wouldn't, therefore they would be forcing themselves upon someone and that is called rape. Rape is illegal you know. If the child consented to have sex then the adult should not be taking advantage over someone who has no fucking clue as to what's about to happen, that's just as bad.

Even if they weren't planning on doing anything physical, just imagining and no-one was hurt... I actually don't know what to say it's too much of a razors edge to judge what level of pedophilia is acceptable so I'm going to say burn all the fuckers at the stake.

I'd expect homosexual rape to be more common than heterosexual rape since heterosexuals are less likely to be rejected.

Also, other fetishes like BDSM are looked down upon almost as much as more harmful ones (ie pedo/zoophilia)

I certainly wouldn't want to befriend a pedophile, but if they know what they think is wrong, and they don't pursue it, I hold no grudge.

I'd expect you to be wrong.

No they aren't. Homosexuals make up quite a large demographic. Not as large as heterosexuals, but the very fact that homosexuality is so widely accepted in Europe indicates that homosexuality is a reasonably common phenomenon.
I wouldn't say so. It seems to me that people would often react with surprise and maybe confusion upon learning about BDSM, but very rarely violence. I suppose they leave that up to the participants.

What sort of nonsense is this? If I was raped every time I turned down another guy's advances I'd be a flapping bag of a man by now. Besides, rape is about far more than sexual gratification. It's about power, and affirming it. Some completely straight rapists are as likely to rape a man as a woman, and do. This behaviour is present throughout the animal kingdom.

I don't pretend that our culture is particularly honest and open about sex across the board. Many of us have it drilled into us that sex is wrong and dirty unless done in a very particular way, and let's not pretend that this is anything but an artefact of religion.

All fetishes are mental disorders, pedophilia is no different.

Now child molestation, that there's a criminal offense.

right

I find it wrong to blame someone simply because he is a pedo. this means, she/he feels sexually attracted to kids. It's not like he chose to be a pedophile.
but when it comes to an abuse or even the slightest advance, that's something to judge.

Well people do blame other people for simply being pedos/zoophiles/even other fetishists that DON'T HARM ANYONE yet they accept homosexuals.

Because homosexuality isn't a fetish.

I don't get why everyone has a problem with my foot fetish.

So can we please spell paedophile right.

No.

You misspelt pædophile.

Fucking Yanks.


And you if we have too many gays we'll have no babies and no humans. Lol, said Hitler...ehem.

Why are people even replying to this guy? He is obviously just crying out for attention because he has no friends

I love this guy.

Because there's nothing wrong with homosexuality, and bigotry needs to be ground into the fucking dirt.

Paedophilia is wrong because it's a child, a child is not sexually aware, so it's a form of exploitation. The child almost never consents, because he/she doesn't understand. Early introduction of sex can lead to either fear or addiction of sex. Teenage prostitutes have all been sexually abused as children.

Zoophilia is just fucking wrong. I don't discriminate (if you can even call it that) against them, I just don't think it's right. You can call that bigotry, but I'd fail to see that. Animals exist to be either left alone, kept as livestock or whatever. Sex with them is just unnatural, even an open minded person will say this. I don't, however, steer them from it because that's just what they want to do.

Coprophilia is just disgusting. I'll voice my protests to them, but I won't stop them from engaging in it. A small percentage may find it...interesting, but it's just wrong. You just don't roll around in other people's shit and eat it.

Sadism or masochism isn't prejudiced against, as far as I'm aware. I personally have no problem with it, I find myself a minor masochist since I like to be bitten (and in some cases, slapped very hard). I see it no different from being spanked for sensation, or even tickled. People are stimulated in different ways.

If you tried to compare homosexuality to these, I advise you to take it back. There's nothing wrong with being gay because they're doing nothing wrong.

Three gay people have the power of INFRACTIONS and PERMABANNING.

And there's an angry, anime loving lesbian prowling about somewhere, too.

Wow, that was alot of ranting. I go now k baiiii

Scat fetish really hurts no one, unless those involved catch something(I dont know the risks of it TBH), but they consented, so that's really moot. I don't see how its different from homosexuality in the fact that it should be frowned upon and homosexuality not, other than you find it disgusting. Which is bigotry in itself .

Bigotry needs to be pushed into the dirt

But pedophiles are all child molesters

And wanting to fuck animals is unnatural

And liking scat is JUST GROSS

So don't be prejudiced kids.

I just skimmed through the first page, you guys really like to feed the trolls.

I said I found it disgusting and unnatural, I didn't say I hated the people who engaged in it.

I also voiced how it was wrong to compare homosexuality to it, coprophilia is a fetish, homosexuality is a sexual identity.

I don't even think bigotry exists toward fetishes, so what I said, wouldn't fall into that equation. Saying homosexuality is a fetish, is bigotry.

Really depending on how loose your definition of fetishes is, any sort of sexual discrimination can be viewed as a fetish.

So, hetrosexuality is a fetish.

Those were some pretty harsh words you used against it, you implied anyone that does it is wrong and disgusting, you will voice your protest bigotry against it.

Is that so?

For example, a man who has a fetish of stuffed animals but wouldn't engage in sexual activities with a live animal because he self-identifies himself as not a zoophile.

If heterosexuality is a fetish, then the human urge to reproduce must be, too.

Nope, because fetishism is defined as fierce sexual discrimination.

Wow even though everyone knows I'm a troll you guys still debate.