Cloverfield monster vs Godzilla
If there was a cool monster vs a monster situation id like to see the Cloverfield monster bunt heads with Godzilla and I am talking about the original Godzilla not the T-Rex mutant thing we saw in that one movie oh yes its Godzilla.
I think Godzilla would win the match how about you? Who do you think would win. Godzilla or Cloverfield? And tell why you think that too. Paramiteabe...:fuzblink: |
Godzilla would fuck Cloverfield in the mouth just to humiliate him. I mean, he's totally not even attracted to him.
|
Godzilla would waste that shitty movie with Nuclear Breath.
Plus, he's indestructible. |
I have no clue what this is about...
|
Shakeycam Vs. Tokutsatsu.
|
:
|
Let's see; Godzilla slashes, roars, headbutts and chews. Cloverfield spawns minions, gets carpet-bombed, barraged by artillery tanks, bombed some more, spawns more minions and then reemerges without a scratch. We all see where this is headed.
Cloverfield wins. Flawless victory. |
I see Godzilla winning, cause of his breathe of fire.
|
Well, at least I know that paramiteabe is an alt now.
P.S. Godzilla kicks the shit out Cloverfield with his legion of Japanese men and nuclear-fucking-breath. |
Wow, I thought at first Cloverfield started this thread... but I was mistaken.
I don't know a damn thing about either monster except that both of them have names that are or have been obscured: 1. What the hell is a CloverField monster and 2. GODZIRRA!!! May they make sweet sweet love.... and may all of us watch as they demolish entire cities in passion. |
:
Godzilla would win, there's just no question. |
Both would collapse under their own weight and suffocate the moment they beached themselves. Seagulls win.
|
Goggalor would kick both of their arses. Simultaneously.
|
Wow, I return and there is a Cloverfield topic. Haha. I must be infecting the forum with my obsession. :p
I of course am bias, so there really is no competition here, cause as far as I'm concerned Clover would kick Godzilla's and any other monsters ass. That and I haven't seen Godzilla since I was like 12 years old ... so I really can't make a viable comparison. Oh, and ... Cloverfield = Best. Movie. Ever! Now I'm off to use my site-owner's powers to fiddle with the poll results. Bwhahahaha! Cloverfield... (Abe Babe) |
Oh? can retarded fish-mutant do THIS?
|
The thing about retarded fish mutants is that they don't HAVE to be able to do that.
:
|
Dude, he's Godzilla. You can't kill Godzilla. They once tried to erase him from history. He somehow crawled out of the ocean and beat the crap out of them. He once went nuclear and blew up, but his Son was there to become the new Godzilla.
Godzilla is so hard that one time a tiny bit of his DNA fell into a garden, and the resulting mutant plant grew out and nearly destroyed the city. The one who felled the plant? Godzilla. Godzilla is so hard he can go to an island full of giant monsters, raise his son there, blow the crap out of a giant Mantis or three, piss off their friends, and even awaken a giant spider monster, and is still confident enough to have a nap while all this is happening. Godzilla is so hard that a bunch of aliens arrived to take over earth by taking control of about every single fucking monster ever. That is: Mothra, Keizer Ghidorah, Gigan, Rodan, Anguirus, King Caesar, Ebirah, Minilla, Zilla, Kamacuras, Kumonga, Manda, Hedorah, Varan, Baragon, Gaira, Gezora, Titanosaurus, Xilien, Gotengo, Mutants, Keizer, Shobijin, Karyu, and motherfucking Monster X, and more. And guess what? Godzilla takes them all on in a conga line and whups each of their butt. If anything, Cloverfield only rates an Ebirah. |
Terrible topic.
But Godzilla, because Cloverfield was bad. EDIT: Not that there haven't been bad Godzilla films. |
Godzilla by a long shot. He shrugs off missiles and bombs like they were nothing on a regular basis. All he'd have to do is rip off Clover's skinny arms and roast him with some atomic breath.
|
:
A mouse could, literally, beat Godzilla by default. |
:
|
Specifications will have to be met, because I will not stop at "something".
And that's not even mentioning his skeleton, which, even if that was strong enough too, his organs are not going to survive the forces of a casual stroll, his skin, which is thick enough to repel military ordnance, would crack and slough off through movement, and under all of it, the heat generated by even the slowest metabolism would cook his flesh to a crisp, unable to be radiated from his body. Basically, even if both Godzilla and Cloverfield lived their entire lives in the ocean, the winner would be either the youngest or the one with the slowest growth. Either way, the ultimate winners would be the crabs and hagfish. Their corpses would be one of the richest ecosystems in the deep ocean, until the giant quantities of scavengers and decomposers use up all the oxygen and die, exacerbating the issue. One can only hop the monsters dies in the Sargasso Sea, or other realm of downwelling current. they |
If you're wondering how he eats & breathes,
And other science facts...(la! la! la!) Then repeat to yourself its just a show, I should really just relax.. |
Dont know what the cloverfield monster is.
|
I believe that the Cloverfield monster would come out second best. If Godzilla can appear in a parody of a children's film, imagine all the other great things he may be capable of. |
:
... GODZIIIIIILLLLAAAAAAAAAAAA |
Godzilla can breathe Nuclear-Breath.
Cloverfield cannot. Though, Chuck Norris would pwn both over. |
Chuck Norris is a bad joke.
|
At least his surface area to mass ratio means he can actually radiate the heat generated by his mammalian metabolism and not cook to death by being alive.
|
:
|
I can enjoy a movie while I'm there like any other. Afterwards, I can tear it apart on a scientific basis. If the writing, directing or acting is so poor that it cannot distract me from these issues, then it's not going to be enjoyed by most people anyway. If the sicence is so insultingly poor that it swamps the entire experience, then it deserved whatever it can get. In the case of The Core, it was a blessing in disguise since is distracted everyone from the terrible writing.
You haven't lived until you've seen The Core with a group of geologists. |
I may never live.
|
I hope I don't ever live.
|
:
|
:
|
|
:
|
.... Dudes .... Godzilla's a fictional film. Physics or "reality" is worth sh** in fiction.
Anyhow, while I appreciate Cloverfield more, Godzilla takes my vote. Godzilla could handle missiles, nukes, hordes & hordes & hordes of monsters, and was originally going to fight Satan in a cancelled flick. Godzilla has whipped out some Matrix-styled moves on Super-Sayan Aliens, Kangaroo kicked an Alien Monster in the crotch multiple times, and--GodzillaDammit--Crushed Bambi into oblivion. I don't think Cloverfield can compare to a crazy ass Dinosaur like that.:fuzcool: |
The problem with comparing two giant beats with questionable science behind them is that in each of their franchises, sometimes between films (or in films!) of the same franchise, they have different physics that apparently make the whole thing possible. It was ridiculous back in the fifties, but even worse now since film-makers obviously make an attempt at realism, but they do this by discussing an interesting few points (often by having a scientist character shoot down an infeasible idea from another character) while completely ignoring all the rest. It's anyone's guess as to whether this is a better, worse or more infuriating situation than before, but it causes problems in versus comparisons when considering two monsters meeting each other, when the lack of science of one would give it an unfair advantage, while the "science" of the other would cause the immediate death of his opponent from natural causes.
Either let them each subsist on their own unique movie physics, in which one therefore wins before any real contest needs to occur, or establish some sort of consistency, in which both are quickly reduced to a bloody pulp of their own accord. The entire exercise, and all its possible solutions, are more futile than usual. |
:
|