You know, I think I might just step out of this conversation for a while... I think it's because of this bit:

Oh, you devil, you! Nice name, by the way. :p

Stepping away now. Bi bai!

Lol! I didn't actually count the minutes away, there was a bedside cabinet with a clock on it (that's how I knew). We didn't have much time, so I was forever glancing at it, as I had to be outta there at a certain time, lest we face the parents :p

Alcar...

Pardon my ignorance, but what is 'spooning'.

I've heard of it, but never known what it is.

You see, I'm not really someone that's into love. I only really have casual sex, obviously with feeling but not love. My friends think I'm promiscuous but I wouldn't put it that way. It's just sex without love.

Oh and Facsimile, spooning is when two people lie back to chest and fit snuggly into each other, kind of like spoons in a cutlery drawer. Hence, spooning.

That's kinda like me ... not promiscuous, I just have sex more casually. I always do it with my partner, I don't go looking for people to screw. (although that's happened)

For some reason, I don't seem to keep sexual partners for long, that's why my friends think of me as being promiscuous. I don't know why, I just have different partners more frequently than other people.

I've always sort of thought that people who sleep with lots of different people can't be as satisfied. Why else would you always be changing partners other than some form of dissatisfaction? Boredom, wanting "variety", etc. are all signs of it, I believe. I wouldn't find sex nearly as great, or perhaps not great at all, without loving my partner. Just a thought.

Which reminds me, Alcar, I have a tiny question. I remember you saying in the first 100 Question survey thread(s) and in a thread about virginity that you were a virgin and "valued your virginity" and whatnot. I'm a bit confused. :confused:

At the time of completing that survey (the first one) I considered virginity to be based solely on penetrative sex. So at the time I'd done the most common things but hadn't progressed to penetrative.

As for the 'value it part'. Meh. I was such a goody-twoshoes back then. However, at least I lost it with someone I like.

Alcar...

Get on MSN now Peter... How can you have sex and not tell me.

Alcar dude, I don't know what that stuff is but... congrats on ditching the straight edge image thing, j/k :p

Good point, there's always people you know who have been round the block a few times. Is sex even worth it if you've got that sort of attitude?

Love beats sex because sex can hurt your Penis.

I wouldn't say I value my virginity as such, but I wan't to lose it with someone I actually like.

Come here. ;):p

Like Rich, I'm don't really value my virginity, it's just I want my first time to be with someone I really like. But when I do, it's not going to be a matter of waking up and going "I've lost my virginity :|".

- Rexy

No. You'll go "I've lost my virginity with Rich :happy:". *ahem*

I don't care who I lose my virginity to, as long it isn't someone with an STD. They sux0rz.

Shush. We must not tell everyone, sugar-muffin [:p], ;). They'll get jealous.

And that is why you get tested for STIs. Safe-sex, children, keep you safe! *hands out condoms*

- Rexy

Ahh, those bring back fond memories :lol:...of when I would fill them up with water then throw them at people's houses.

Don't do that! Don't you know how many people in Vietnam die so those things are produced!

Do something worthwhile with them, like throw them at Hobo. Or better, donate them to me, I assure you that Rexy and I won't waste them.

Hell no! Those things are hella expensive. And I'm too goody goody so I use the ones me and my friend use. No, she's not a boy, eeew, I can't imagine having sex with another guy. It's actually quite amzing how a small piece of latex can hold so much water. I guess some people are unpredictable.

Condoms, expensive? They're free where I live. They give them out by the boxful, in all shapes and sizes. Extra-large ones, extra-small ones *glances at Rich* :p, even chocolate flavoured ones for your oral needs. Of course, Sugar-Muffin tastes like sugar, so we don't need those. ;)

Seen as we're on the subject of condoms, does wearing a condom during sex make sex better, worse or is it still the same? [Apart from without condoms you could get pregnant, but the girl could be on the pill or some other form of contraception.]

- Rexy

Feh. I wouldn't say they make it "worse", but without would certainly feel a bit better for both partners, at least that's what I think. It's not "Oh man... we have to use condoms... This sucks..." at all. It's more like every now and then we say "I wish we could do it without them so we could feel more of each other." But unsafe sex is a no, no.

What about the pill, Ambi? Or a douche? But on the disease thing, yeah, condoms are the best protection I guess.

Yes. Condoms pwn. And, as Rexy says, they can be obtained for free in the UK from family planning clinics. Which is good if you need a large supply. Then again, getting them from a machine is sometimes better and less embarrassing.

I remember when I was about 9 my friend and I bought some condoms from a dispenser in a hotel toilet. We had a pack of standard ones that we blew up and threw around and a strawberry flavoured, oral only one, shaped and intricately detailed to look like a garden gnome that was part of a collector series. I spent about five minutes trying to work out WTF it was supposed to look like. :lol:

We threw them out of our hotel window and found them the next day in the car park. Good times.

As my mom does not know about my relations with Luke, I find too risky to keep pills in my room; she's snoops so much that she'd be bound to find them. Besides, it's only a little while until I'm 18. And luckily, I don't have to worry about the disease thing.

I don't even want to reply to the douche thing. *grimace* But let it be known that that is not a good idea. It can actually push spermies further inside a woman, increasing the risk of pregnancy.

Ah how times have changed.

As for you Rich, do yinz live in the UK? Becuase in the US, they are HELLA expensive. :P

I hope I just answered that. It's a much better system if they can be obtained for free because us Brits are all sex mad, apparently. Rexy certainly is at least.

As for America, you need free condoms. It may explain the high teenage pregnancy rate there that they aren't available, (Britain's rate is also high, but thats to do with the lower and stupider orders outnumbering the pleasant and clever people). Also, It'd help immensely if sex wasn't so taboo over there, they don't even give you good enough sex ed videos/ lessons as far as I've heard.

I don't know if it's the anti sex thing America has pounded on us, or the intense greed of our corrupt goverment.

oh those crazy radical christians, always ruining america

Condoms over here usually come in packets (though you can buy singles from dispensers in some toilets / hotel washrooms / etc). A packet can cost from $6 upwards.

When I first bought them I was actually surprised. I didn't expect them to cost that much. Not that I cared though :p

Alcar...

Well, if you weren't so demanding... There's not even a specific time for you! You just demand, I'm not a machine Rich. I have to be loved! [Nevermind you finishing in 3 minutes. What's that about?]

Where I live, it's the one of the worst places in the whole of Britain for teen pregnancy. So my school practically throws them at you, and you can get packs of 2 or 3 in toilets for £1. And Britain is the worst place for Teen -Pregnancies in the whole of Europe.

... Damn, we suck.

- Rexy

It's because you're so damn hawt. ;)
I rarely have time to get the condom on before I unload...

Britain's rate of teenage pregnancies is terrible and worsening. Jacob needs to be in charge NOW. I'm sure he'd solve the problems with his one child policies and castration policies. :p