:
|
:
|
:
How many Netherlanders does it take to screw in a lightbulb? More than enough, it sounds like. |
Do you even know what you're talking about? I dunno how things work over there but over here the people in charge actually do the work they are in charge of. Silly Americans :')
|
I read that as: How many Neanderthals does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
|
I'm going to bed now people. I think we've never filled up 7 pages of posts this quickly. Pat yourself on the shoulder everyone!
Thanks for laughs! |
Thank God, he's gone.
|
|
Never has a thread been more appropriately titled in the history of these forums. I'm gonna try and sum up my reaction to the various posters.
Havoc: Initially brought up the topic of entrapment of pederasts who have not yet committed any crime. An interesting topic, which no-one actually discussed because they just assumed he was defending sex offenders. Later on, he brings up some interesting philosophical questions about maturity and appropriate ages to have sex when it's not an abusive relationship. Once again, no-one actually responds to this because they just assumed he was advocating sex offenders. scrabface: Also a fascinating topic; how should we deal with people whose brains are wired up to be attracted to someone underage? It's a difficult topic and one that no-one actually responded too because it was more entertaining to belittle him. OANST: Suffers a knee-jerk reaction to the topic of paedophila and seems to be incapable of actually reading and comprehending anyone else's post without the red mist of anger dropping down. Rather than demanding that Havoc stop posting, I would think it more appropriate if OANST stopped reading. Moxco: Seriously... what the fuck, dude? Everyone else: Needs to grow a brain and the ability to discuss a difficult issue maturely. Also needs to READ everyone elsels posts and UNDERSTAND the point they're trying to make, rather than the point that they've already assumed they would make. I'm not sure whether to leave this thread open, given that it's descended to the level of personal attack. I'll leave it open for now but any more posts that insult other members will receive infractions. |
I’m sorry for being a prick everyone. I was bored and felt like arguing even if I wasn't arguing my own opinion.
|
:
|
And a moustache!
|
I have both, thanks.
|
:
|
I agree whole-heartidly with Nate's summary of this thread. I think Havoc's posts were misinterpreted although the points he made where hard to pick out at first, he did make some good points. I think it's a shame this thread just turned into namecalling/Yur famleh, because it could have become quite an interesting discussion.
|
I would like to apologise to OANST. I never tried to personally attack him (or his family for that matter).
Let us just go through this again; :
Of course after responding my comment would have looked a lot worse than intended. If I had known how it would have appeared I wouldn't have wrote it. I hope you can understand what I am trying to get across. |
Fair enough.
Nate: I fully understood and responded to his arguments multiple times. Never once did I ignore what he was saying. What I was saying is that as the person who is attracted to young girls he is not in an objective position to decide which ones are too young and which aren't. On multiple occasions in this thread I admitted that no one matures at a set rate, and it's impossible to say at what age an individual will be ready. Soooo, to keep predatory adults from damaging those who aren't ready we are going to have an age of consent. You break it, there will be repercussions. And any adult who actually tries to have sex with a young girl is such a disgusting creature that even if it doesn't damage this particular individual they still deserve the repercussions. In regards to Scrabface: Wrong again, Nate. I responded to him multiple times. I answered his question multiple times. It wasn't until the third time that he asked the question that I asked him to stop changing the subject, especially since he was already answered. Also, while I did eventually degenerate into insults, I was attempting to discuss it rationally until Moxco's comment, at which point I started bleeding from my ears. Havoc's insistence that I watch what I say to him made me lose my sanity. Yes, I initially attempted to stop Havoc before it even started (knowing that the conversation wouldn't work on any coherent level for long), but I made an attempt afterwards to discuss it. |
I thought I did a decent job of trying to rationalize with Havoc for a while. It just gets hard.
|
Sweet fagwankery i just read the entire thread.
|
Thank you for reading the thread, Shaman. But our princes is in another castle.
|
How old is she?
|
You will find out when you find her.
|
:
|
Dun Dun DUN!
|
Hooray, we're all chums again. Luckily, I was away from my computer for a day we ended up with 7 pages of shouting. Big fat Reset button:
A person over the Age of Consent is intending to have sex with someone under it, and vice versa. We're all in agreement that these situations will likely have negative consequences. Where do the problems with these situations lie? What can be done about them? |
FUCK YOU, ASSHOLE.
|
OANSTs gone gay and mad; he's yelling at Meech's ass.
|
And Josh has no idea how he buggered Meech's ass up.
|
How can this thread still be open?
When other amazing threads such as mine get closed, having more content and room for discussion? May as well rebirth that "What are you listening to?" thread. Or perhaps a "What emoticon correlates to your IRL mood ATM" thread. |
"You closed my thread. WAH!"
"You didn't close their thread. WAH!" You're one of the few non-dumb dumbs that show up from time to time. Post something of a higher quality. Shit would have sifted down to the bottom of the page, but you decided to bump it back to the top simply because it wasn't closed. And because the mods are in the habit of giving baby leto what baby leto want, it probably will be. You're not fun anymore. |