:
()
That is a bloody lie. In slavery, many people gave up their hope to go on, because they were just treated so badly. Being beaten so badly before going to sleep is not something you would like, since the pain is so bad. Some people are even tramatized, like when I watched a show, a man was put in a jail cell after going through torture. He wakes up in the middle of the night with his hands bloody, not because of being beaten, but of his previous torture. He was scratching his skin off on the wall because he was scared the crap out of him. He would shake up and down, moaning, thinking that there was no chance of survival. So yeah, being beaten that badly is pretty much a bad punishment. Not going to stop them from acting out, but they sure will think twice.
|
Being beaten
can be brutal. But not in all cases. If a murderer or rapist is beaten on a daily basis while they stay in prison, and if their sentence is long enough, they'll just end up murdering the individual(s) who beat them. What have they got to lose? Most of them already have life terms, or terms close to it, and some of them are inprisoned in states that don't believe in the death penalty, so killing off another inmate won't even faze them. Beating them might just end in another murder. Not in all cases, but some.
:
()
Is it really worth anything when they are killed? Huh? Will the little girl forget everything about being abused? How about the family how have had some of their family killed? Will they see their relative again because the murderer died? No. Because it solves nothing but have 2 people gone from this world. There is no sasifaction afterwards. You would have to be sick if you were sasitified.
My grandmother tells me stories of people who have had their family members killed. They had their large family killed, and the people were looking for them. One of them took in her sisters' daughter, and another one. She did not go on thinking that she must raise the children to hate murderers. She left her country instead. Another women had her entire family killed, but yet she is one of the happiest people around. Why? Because she doesn't seek vengence. If one person is killed over an unforgiveble act, it just adds to the pile of people who were killed because of that. And like I said, no sasifaction. We would not feel any better.
Name me five murderers, who later repeated the same crime. Tell me, if your ratios are so true. And you lack to see the reason why the death penelty exists. It was created because the villages or counties had no space in their jails or did not have one at the time. So they got rid of them instead. But America does have a jail, and most of states think it is OK to kill the offenders off. So really, it doesn't make sense to have such a punishment.
To add something, not all people who are killed for those acts, haven't commited them. I remember someone who was executed, who admitted to someone that he was covering for his brother. His brother didn't want to receive the consquences, so he claimed that he did it, instead of his brother. Yeah, he was executed. So a man who did not deserve such a punishment, commited it. So is it really necessary to have a punishment?
What I am trying to say is that someone shouldn't also come with the dead person. It doesn't do anything really.
And about that thing with senseless killing, you probably shouldn't kill them, but you should at least escape. WIth a little violence, but no killing. Just wrong.
|
Killing the inidividual that causes you some sort of trauma or pain, doesn't take away the pain. I'll give you that. Although, it
does in some way relieve the individual(s) involved, knowing that the rapist or murderer is gone from this world, and has suffered a fate that they deserved. It's just another sick human being off the streets. One that might have caused someone else such harm in the future had he or she been left alive.
Once again, you are right. It doesn't take the pain away. But, if I had something horrible happen to my loved one, and I knew who the murderer was and where he was located, I would go after him, and make him suffer for his crimes. What's more, I'd find temporary satisfaction in knowing that he suffered just as much, if not more, than they did. And you can't say that other people wouldn't do this. You haven't the slightest clue what you would do in such a situation. You change drastically, and the world changes with you. You look at things from a different perspective, and you want nothing more but revenge. Whether or not you act on it matters not, as the pain will not go away, but nonetheless, you
have the thought of vengeance in your mind. You may not commit the act, but you
do ponder it regardless.
I'd love to name you five murderers who have been repeat offenders. I've seen plenty on Cold Case Files. However, I do not know their names. You have to understand that psychopathic and sociopathic individuals would not hesitate to commit the same crime twice, if they are freed. They are emotionaly immature. They do
not understand the difference between right and wrong. They are hollow human beings who could care less about the consequences. Could you honestly tell me that if we were to put Jeffrey Dahmer in jail early in his life, and he parolled somehow, that he would change his ways? If you believe that, you honestly do
not know how the mind of a serial killer works. Their urges are stronger than them. They
can't control themselves. That's why I said it's better off to be rid of them than to have to deal with future horrors.
I know that our judicial system is flawed. And I also know that innocent people have been sent to prison and even have been killed there, senselessly. However, there's nothing we can do about that. Unless we develop some way to truly see into a person's mind, and figure out, without a shadow of a doubt, that they are responsible for a heinous crime, our judicial system always has a chance of sentencing an innocent man to death.
What if escape is impossible? What if you are cornered, and are facing someone who has a weapon, and is willing to take your life? Would you just wound him, and risk him murdering you nonetheless? Or would you ensure you survival, by killing him instead?