I can see what you mean, I guess it's just my prejudice of the plains and the south.

On a message forum.

Hilary Duff
Lindsay Lohan
Amanda Bynes
The Olsen Twins

Aww... that's my girl. You do need to write stuffs for me!

...

The fact that the new Zelda game got pushed back is kinda bugging me, as geeky as that is.

Some people overcomplicate a subject in such a way that you think that a profound statement is coming, only to discover that you already knew it:

"Walking on a ceiling is very different from normal walking," Stanislav Gorb of the Max Planck institute for Metals research, Germany, says in a press release, "because gravity tends to pull an inverted insect away instead of pressing it to the surface." Thanks for the insight.

Other people get into an angry rage in a debat that is supposed to be light and for the interest of the audience.

Extract from New Scientist

Sparring physicists provided some entertainment at the annual Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate, held last month at the American Museum of Natural History in New York. Physicists Andrei Linde, Michio Kaku, Lisa Randall, Lawrence Krauss and Virginia Trimble tussled over the theme "Universe: One or Many?" taking a packed audience on a dizzying trip to the farthest reaches of cosmological imagination. Sometimes the trip was too unsettling even for the physicists themselves.
Kaku, of the City University of New York, spoke at one point of the possibility of tunnelling into other universes through space-time foam, harnessing the power of negative energy. "Genesis happens all the time," he said. "Continuous genesis in an ocean of Nirvana, and the ocean is 11-dimensional hyperspace."
As Kaku spoke, Krauss, of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, looked on as if he was about to have an aneurysm. He turned to Kaku. "If there are an infinite number of universes," he declared, "I can’t imagine one in which I agree with what you just said."
During the question and answer session, a young member of the audience asked if our universe was the first in the tree of branching universes projected on the backdrop behind the speakers. "It’s extraordinarily unlikely that we live in the first universe," Linde, of Stanford University, explained. "We live in the middle of infinity."
That was too much for the chair of the evening, Neil deGrasse Tyson, astrophysicist and director of the Hayden Planetarium of New York. "We live in the middle of infinity?" he repeated. "Did those words just come out of your mouth?"

This one doesn't bug me in particular, but I'm sure someone out there finds my posting of it in the thread annoying, and will proceed to add "Bullet Magnet" to their list of irritating things.

My computer pisses me off. The internet just disconnected itself for the past 20 minutes and no matter what I did, it refused to even attempt to re-connect (i'm on dialup). So I ha to turn the whole thing off, losing anything I was watching or downloading on the internet. :compmad:
EDIT: and to OANST, I know you're joking (I think) but no, it was not porn.

All that porn gone forever.

Yes, agree absolutely on the shakey science in advertising gunk. It's getting a lot better than it used to be, I suppose, but it's still painful.

Political bitchfests where Parliament fling sadomasochistic verbal insults at each other instead of fixing any problems.

Tabloids.

The environmentally-friendly craze. It serves a practical purpose, but it leads to such idiocy. Tesco has built an environmentally-friendly supermarket somewhere. When asked if they'd make an effort to go there, several members of the public said they would to make sure it gets used. They obviously forget that that will multiply the overall pollution because they have to drive there. Oh, and there'd be less emissions still if the place didn't exist.

Tesco. What an arsehole of a company. 30% of the U.K. market? What do they seriously need that for, in the name of sanity? I mean, it's really great that people can now get all their food by conveniently driving further than is to walk to the local shops, but when the local shops are outcompeted by Tesco's soulless, heartless monopoly it makes you want to move into a ditch and survive off slurry.

'nuff said, my friends. ;)
But what also gets me is when I'm invisibly bleeding.
Its like, you get a cut, and it didn't hurt, so you figure it won't bleed.
Next thing ya know, yer entire leg is red in blood, and so is yer fingers!
It's absolutely apaulling!
And it's happenin' to me right now, shit...>.<

What? Because Michael Jackson started an illegal war? Because Michael Jackson is a sad reflection of the idiot majority opinion of the ‘American People’? Because Michael Jackson is so stupid that the very idea of him having more power than is necessary to peel his bananas makes me break out in a cold sweat?

No? Oh, alright then...

Good job on not reading any of my following posts.

People who diss Tesco. I'm not a fan or anything, but if so many people hate it (and they do) then there is an easy way to stop its growth: stop shopping there. Easy.

yeah, that pushing back of Zelda pisses me off too,
O-zone isn't a band anymore
uh...people who hate classic games, and call games from the NES and SNES, sucky games

they have no ****ing soul

O-Zone sucks in my opinion.
The only reason they got a leg up is because everyone thought that fat bastard lip-syncing one of their songs was totally f*cking uber.

The more I listened to them, the more it became apparent that I was just indulging in the Romanian N-Sync.

I don't shop with Tesco. Criticism denied.

You’ve only given one more post on this subject: “People berate Bush because he's an idiot, but they don't actually know why he's an idiot. I hate Bush as much as the next guy, don't get me wrong, but at least I can give several reasons why.”

And that changes what I said how? So – we can’t call Bush an idiot until we know why he’s an idiot? That’s some pretty flimsy logic you got yourself there. Tsk. *rolls eyes*

He's mad because you basically paraphrased his previous post while trying to make him look stupid at the same time.

That's what pisses me off.

And that's quite a skill, I feel! :)

Anyway - my original post did contain a bit of repetition in an effort to show that what he said was stupid. But hey ho.

There's your reason. It's not 'flimsy logic' and it's not stupid. Blatantly hating something without justification is just pointless angst, or is that too 'outside-the-box' for you?

So explain to me why you had to follow up with a patronizing post. Were you getting at something poignant or are you just looking for outlets to inflate your balls?

What?! Of course that's flimsy logic! Deary me. So - all those millions of people around the world who slate Bush purely do it off the back of one another? I could just as easily say that you're saying what you're saying merely to be one of those irritating people who always go against popular opinion to show how cool and what an independent thinker they are. I'm not saying you are, but it's the same idea.

I loathe (not hate) Bush for very good reasons, and it's interesting that you seem to think that your reasons are superior to everybody else’s who are simply following the flock and have no decent motivation. How patronising! Which leads me nicely to:

I'm being patronising because you are obviously doing exactly the same. Telling me I think what I think for a) bad reasoning and b) to simply go along with current opinion. The 'something poignant' is just that your point is ridiculous. While, obviously, there are some who rip on Bush because it soundz kool, most, I think you'll find, do not. How are my reasons wrong or incorrect? They're not, you're just being pompous.

I'm listening to Billy Jean right now... Hope that pisses you off. :D

I'm hating Bush because he started a war... Not because everyone else does...

First of all, I really don't think you have much justification to be accusing people's ideas 'flimsy logic' and people pompous, you have only been on this forum a few days, so you have little or no jstification to be accusing people of being 'pompous.'

Second of all, how do you your idea isn't flimsy logic? Sekto Springs could be correct in his judgement and he is correct in many of the cases that I have seen. You are only making yourself pompous by accusing others of it when you have little knowledge of them to begin with.

I have to say that you aren't making very many mutual friends in here. People are going to start flaming pretty soon. And then I'll have to step in. AND FLAME YOU HARDER THAN YOU'VE EVER BEEN FLAMED BEFORE. In case anyone was wondering, I'm the new Dino.

I thought I was the neo Dino? Cuz you guys know, I'm just SUCH a big fan of him, seriously, I maturbate to his posts all the time.

He does. I saw him. It was sexy.

oy... Why must thou bash Dino? -_- He's history. Let's think of the future.... ^_^ Where we all masturbate to each other's posts.

I wasn't bashing Dino, I was bashing the people who accuse me of "being in love with him."

Just ignore their comments ^_^ Or acuse them for being in love with Dino too then :p

I accuse you of being in love with cats. And I can prove it! I looked at your banner. Dispute that evidence.

Yes i am in love with cats ^_^ You are in love with Used:-)

Don't be ridiculous. I am quite a pompous person on occasion, especially when dealing with pompous people! I have every justification - I didn't say he was a pompous person, I said he was being pompous, which can perfectly be judged from the comments he has posted. You're way off track here.

I know my logic isn't flimsy - again - in this instance as it very obviously isn't. He said my reasoning was dodgy or whatever (really using shorthand now) without saying why that was the case and simply banged on with how HIS judgement was superior. How am I wrong? You just don't like the fact I'm new and calling his cards. How dare I?! etc

You just have to be careful Mutual Friend; people here are immediately suspicious if someone new shows up, is pompous and seems to have a strangely accurate understanding on how the forums work. Unfortunately we've seen so many multis over the years that people are perhaps becoming far too vigilant in watching out for a new one.

Anyway, try and build a rapport with people here before becoming objectionable. It helps avoid controversy.

He's obviously a multi of max the mug and lots of other members :-/ lol.... At least he has the same IP as Max...

Hmm... Suspicion suspicion...

Err... we don't have the same IP address. Well, we might but it sounds very impossible since this character hasn't been near my computer... or has he?


No, no he hasn't.





Or HAS he?

I agree with nate. I've learnt the hard way what happens when you are objectionable, even by accident. If the thread demands a scientific answer let met answer scientifically! Some of the replies to them annoy me.

If you must bash a president, then make it President Mugabe. Bush is a bad president because he's dim. Mugabe's a bad president because he's evil. He's like all the villains of Oddworld rolled up, squeezed into human form and with all the humour forcibly extracted via colonic irrigation.

PETA. I f*cking hate them! "Oh we don't like meat or products that come from them so we'll just force people into our way of thinking and we'll also start blowing up places." These people need to die of lack of Protein or more ironicly, get mowed down by a truck with a dog at the wheel. Also, they believe milking cows and trimming sheep is wrong, which is stupid considering they'd probubly die if we didn't milk or sheer them. Anyone else fed up of PETA?

Yeah man, I just hate those orginizations that oppose animal cruelty.

Perhaps there should be an amendment that says that no republican government can start or willingly participate in a war. This back to all of America's recent wars, and the government in power at the time.

What a pig's ear...

Yeah man, I can't stand anyone but the democrats having a say in politics.

I can't tell if you're being serious or not anymore.