Interesting, I didn't know that.
|
:
Basically, HTML elements act like containers – everything is a container and/or sits inside one. The problem with this design is that you would have the username inside the same container as the post content, so it would have to remain within that container at every level – mobile, desktop, tablet etc. This design works for a mobile layout, but I don’t think it would translate well into a desktop layout. I think we need to keep user details (name, title, rep etc) within the same container in order for it to make sense. |
:
In this case I think it is possible to have it detect what browser someone is using using an external script. Desktop = 1. Mobile = 2. Then have the result parsed somewhere in the PHP. Then in the conditional system you could roughly tell it to: If parameter = 2 display information here. Else = display information there. This would take a LOT of puzzeling in the template files though and is by no means easy to set up. But it is possible. http://www.vbulletin.com/docs/html/t...e_conditionals |
Huh, I didn’t know that.
I guess if it’s possible to use those conditionals to detect width in a similar fashion to CSS media queries it would be totally possible to have it conditionally display usernames in one container or another. I wonder if conditionals update on browser resize though... |
:
|
slight revision of the design i did http://oi49.tinypic.com/1se90x.jpg
|
That's not an improvement, that's a step backwards. The username should be a default font just like anything else, for sake of simplicity.
|
Revision. I know the longer usernames would be cut off, but you could tap the profile picture to bring up a more information window which would display the full username along with all other user information. Windows Phone cuts off names of people you add to the homescreen, so Microsoft obviously don't see it as that much of a problem. You have the first part of the usernames and the profile picture, so you should be able to identify the user with no hesitation anyway.
http://i50.tinypic.com/b8u3ya.png |
I could live with that, but it's not really 'the way' from a design perspective. What about all the buttons that need to be there? Edit, quote, page numbers, reply button...
|
:
EDITED AGAIN: Like this (just an example): http://i49.tinypic.com/34y770k.png |
When the fuck did I talk about a fox and a dog?
Also, I think the names would fit best just as they are there, except directly under the avatar. |
:
I still think an app like Tapatalk would make this entire project 10 times easier. |
There are a lot of things that would make this easier. Trouble is getting them.
I’m not entirely convinced having hidden elements that only reveal themselves when you tap in certain spots is a good idea, though – in fact it’s decidedly mystery meat, which is almost never a good idea. |
Manco's right.
OWF's new skin should consist entirely of flying Abe heads. |
There's just the profile picture and the 'post bubbles' that are touchables. Is your mystery meat point about if someone chooses the skin and hasn't heard anything about it, and wonders how the hell you reply, or rep, or report?
I think the less clutter the better. And as long as the user knows how to access the posting options from having read this thread (for example), then I think they'd find the interface easy to use. |
The problem with "mystery meat" is simple - buttons are there to do something as quickly and intuitively as possible. Anything that makes buttons take longer and more confusing to use is therefore stupid.
I've been here for years, but if the text was taken off of the Edit/Quote/MQ/QR buttons, it would still take me a couple of seconds longer to post such enlightening diatribe as you are currently reading. By my calculations, that would make a conservative total of five hours spent searching for buttons since joining. Do you realise how much wanking I could do in five hours!? |
BTW: Don't forget that you're going to have to include the moderator options. On each post that would be an Infraction button and a checkbox, as well as two dropdowns for each thread. And don't get me started on the forum display page.
|
:
|
If I can get a working demo of VBulletin then the mod options shouldn't be too much trouble.
I've spent a bit of time playing with Foundation. Here's a couple points:
|
Mystery Meat sounds like a good forum theme, as long as it doesn't actually live up to it's namesake.
|
New ‘n’ Mystery
:
I also came across this article on responsive typography which got me thinking about where the best place to start with layout designs would be. I’m of the opinion that the most important element of a forum is the user posts, so this is a logical place to start. There’s already been discussion on that, so – hooray? |
:
If so, is that really something we need? Personally I've never had a problem reading text on my phone, it's just the navigation that's a pain in the ass. |
:
|
How will images be handled? Will we be able to zoom in on them? (Assuming they'll just be resized)
|
:
As for images, I too would like to see some sort of function that auto resizes images to the maximum page width (unlike now where a page can be stretched infinitely) and lets you click on them to see the true size. But that's stuff we need to look at once the basic theme is done. |
Dang dude, that post was forever and a day ago and has already been discussed to death.
|
Git'Im, the Necrophaggot.
|
Lighten up guys, Git'Im's obviously new.
Manco, how are things progressing? |
:
If you really admire my presence that much I'm sure I can send you a self portrait of me to fap at. |