Not in the slightest. The more we discover, the further the horizons retreat.

maybe, you don't know what you're gibbering on about.

this.

Real Science and loving every moment. ;)

We're on the inside but there is no outside.

One side of my face dropped.

how did scientists figure this out?

that's probably true

thanks for the info

hmm,never saw this,thanks for the info,hm what do you think has a black hole any endings,like it sucks you and throws you out somewhere else(if we ever unlock the technology to iron or a material that could withstand the gravity crush)

Well, energy cannot simply...vanish, neither can matter, it can only be transformed, so there may be entirely new...let me think of a word to cover this...worlds, in a non-planetary sense, that our brains must see to understand, within the holes.

good point, like water, it cant be, you know, destroyed, it can only change state, the amount of water on this earth was the same amount as there was 65 million years ago, its in a cycle.

yeah,did anyone saw that vid that explains how did the ice age started?

meteor, dust, ice, brrr!

they said something to do with co2,while they were drilling on the ice on the tarctic

You tit, of course there's a different amount of water...blasted by comets, creating water from hydrogen plants, chemical reactions, alkenes. You ruined my space vacuum argument, you can never be forgiven.

who me?

Yer you! No, OtitIB

well i was talking about a planet filled with co2

well, i meant that water cant be destroyed, more water can come but i didnt think id point that out as it would just get more complicated and i didnt think any of you knewww....
:fuzsad:

Water sure as hell can be destroyed.

Water is H2O. You can break it down into Hydrogen and Oxygen.

There isn't a set amount of water in the universe.

yes, not destroyed though is it? its components are still hanging about, its not water, but its still there.

But then it's not water, is it?

but its still there, and can be made into water again

Just don't compare water to space, ever, again! March to bed right now meeseter!

Our atmosphere is like 70% hydrogen and 19% oxygem.

By your logic, 57% of our atmosphere is water.

it takes lots of energy to put them together to make water,so even if there is example 50 %hidrogen and 50 % oxigen,it takes quite a lot of force or pressure to make it into water

I think the point is that matter can't be destroyed, it can be changed but it can't be destroyed

You mean 66%/33% I think.

it was just an example

Wait shit what am I talking about? 70% of our atmosphere is nitrogen.

It's been way too long since chemistry.

It's around 78%. But it's variable.

20% of it is oxigen or air all together for us to breath

Of course energy cannot vanish. If a black hole sucks in some matter, it doesn't disappear in to the ether. The black hole becomes more massive and its gravitational pull increases.

A white hole?

I don't think there is any evidence to support white holes and the concept doesn't make sense (at least not to me)

A white hole would just be a star.

the concept of a white hole is the oppisite of a black hole (pushes things away instead of pulling them in) I belive such a thing is impossable, but I could be wrong (as I often am)

Cool! I'm gonna go swim in the sky for a while.

It was a Red Dwarf reference.

Let's break this down for a moment; a black hole is called 'black hole' because:
a) It does not emit light (i.e. black)
b) It's gravitational pull is so strong that almost nothing can escape (i.e. a hole)

Something with the name 'white hole' would emit light, but would still be a hole. Note that this also means that the gravitational pull must therefore be weaker as it is that force that stops light from being emitted.

What you're hypothesising about would be some sort of infinite emitter of light and particles, which is impossible. I suppose the closest thing to an 'opposite' of a black hole would be a supernova, which is a massively exploding star.

I thought the idea was that the white hole was somehow recieving the matter pulled into the black hole. That doesn't make it any more plausible, of course. Besides, that area's alredy covered by the wormhole theory.