Oddworld Forums

Oddworld Forums (http://www.oddworldforums.net/index.php)
-   Non-Oddworld Gaming (http://www.oddworldforums.net/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   DoubleFine's Kickstarter Proposal (http://www.oddworldforums.net/showthread.php?t=20718)

OANST 04-05-2012 06:29 AM

:

()
Sorry, but I've got a boyfriend and we're monogamous.

Is it normal for people in your part of the world to start sexual relationships with their brothers?

Sicko.

Also, what Meech said.

Also, congratulations.

Wil 04-05-2012 07:08 AM

:

()
As OANST's comment didn't specifically warrant that response, I predict a 3/4 probability that this is a recently escalated relationship which Nate is keen to boast about.

You're... predicting a probability?

MeechMunchie 04-05-2012 07:13 AM

I sure am. The probability value cannot be established as a certainty, as many variables are unknown.

Wings of Fire 04-05-2012 07:21 AM

:

()
The probability is not certain

No shit Sherlock.

MeechMunchie 04-05-2012 07:30 AM

Well yeah. If something isn't certain to happen, there is no way you can give a absolutely precise likelihood for it to happen. I've edited my previous post for clarity anyway.

Jokes aren't meant to be analysed like this!

Manco 04-05-2012 08:10 AM

:

()
No shit Sherlock.

Hey now, a probability of one is still a probability.

Wings of Fire 04-05-2012 08:27 AM

:

()
Hey now, a probability of one is still a probability.

Only if you're being pedantic as hell, otherwise it's a certainty.

Wil 04-05-2012 08:55 AM

Of course it's a probability. If P = 1, you are defining or describing the probability. That's like saying 100% isn't a percentage or that 0 isn't a cardinal number.

OANST 04-05-2012 09:06 AM

I'm going to have to infract you guys if you don't get back on topic.

MeechMunchie 04-05-2012 09:38 AM

WoF read my post wrong and is wrong.

Wings of Fire 04-05-2012 09:45 AM

I read your post like a normal person, rather than a statistician.

Nate 04-05-2012 05:12 PM

:

()
As OANST's comment didn't specifically warrant that response, I predict a 3/4 probability that this is a recently escalated relationship which Nate is keen to boast about.

Actually, it was just a pathetic attempt on my part to imply innuendo on OANST's part.

But, that aside, yes and maybe.

MeechMunchie 04-06-2012 08:52 AM

Oh, "backing". I get it.

OANST 04-06-2012 09:39 AM

Bit of a stretch there.

Just like my dick when we....when we were.....backing.

Varrok 04-06-2012 09:54 AM

I kinda lost my respect for Tim Schafer... hell, he's been... backed by EIGHTY SEVEN THOUSAND people! And I thought EA were sluts for money

OANST 04-06-2012 09:57 AM

You lost your respect for him because people gave him 800 times the amount of money he asked for? Are you stupid or joking? Only two options available. Pick one.

Varrok 04-06-2012 09:59 AM

I was joking. It was based on the other definition of "backing"

OANST 04-06-2012 10:01 AM

Ah. See, Nate? This is what happens when you try to make words that aren't dirty dirty. You created this confusion, you son of a bitch.