But doesn't my knowledge just drive you mad?


It's not very interesting anyway. I just know how the money broke down. I also just wanted to post something to alleviate boredom.

I don't play many adventure games, and the only Double Fine game I've particularly enjoyed is Psychonauts. You just have fun supporting a company that you like.

I refuse.

Well, I guess it's not something to be made light of. You're part of a very exclusive club, after all, of just 87,142 people. I'm sure your $101 made all the difference in their $3,336,371 total.

Have I mentioned fuck you yet? No? Fuck you.

:p

Annoying MeechMunchie is truly a thing to be feared. Also, I've/we've been screwing up a lot of topics recently. I think I'd better be quiet.

I know that too. Knew it even before you posted about it. So nerrrr.

We're brothers in backing! How exciting for us!

Sorry, but I've got a boyfriend and we're monogamous.

As OANST's comment didn't specifically warrant that response, I predict a 3/4 probability that this is a recently escalated relationship which Nate is keen to boast about.

Is it normal for people in your part of the world to start sexual relationships with their brothers?

Sicko.

Also, what Meech said.

Also, congratulations.

You're... predicting a probability?

I sure am. The probability value cannot be established as a certainty, as many variables are unknown.

No shit Sherlock.

Well yeah. If something isn't certain to happen, there is no way you can give a absolutely precise likelihood for it to happen. I've edited my previous post for clarity anyway.

Jokes aren't meant to be analysed like this!

Hey now, a probability of one is still a probability.

Only if you're being pedantic as hell, otherwise it's a certainty.

Of course it's a probability. If P = 1, you are defining or describing the probability. That's like saying 100% isn't a percentage or that 0 isn't a cardinal number.

I'm going to have to infract you guys if you don't get back on topic.

WoF read my post wrong and is wrong.

I read your post like a normal person, rather than a statistician.

Actually, it was just a pathetic attempt on my part to imply innuendo on OANST's part.

But, that aside, yes and maybe.

Oh, "backing". I get it.

Bit of a stretch there.

Just like my dick when we....when we were.....backing.

I kinda lost my respect for Tim Schafer... hell, he's been... backed by EIGHTY SEVEN THOUSAND people! And I thought EA were sluts for money

You lost your respect for him because people gave him 800 times the amount of money he asked for? Are you stupid or joking? Only two options available. Pick one.

I was joking. It was based on the other definition of "backing"

Ah. See, Nate? This is what happens when you try to make words that aren't dirty dirty. You created this confusion, you son of a bitch.