I've not resgined from the forums, and no! That role shall still be mine, albeit reluctantly.

And yeah, fuck my earlier "No more Ot" thing. Melodrama sucks, curse me for using it.



And the way I say it sexual attractions to 12 yr olds is paedophilia, whatever the technical term is its still a form of paedophilia. However I think sex with under 16 yr olds being classed as rape is a bit daft, as you do get some 15 yr olds who basically go out looking for a shag. So its hardly rape then.

This.

At that age, curves develop, breast start growing. That isn't pedo. Pedophilia is getting off to kids just being kids. Watching them play in the park, laugh, cry. That is pedophilia.

I understand your point but I still think its paedophilia at its core. It may not seem to be in the same sense but they're 12 for God's sakes. If you were saying it about a 14 or 15 yr old I maybe could understand your point as by then they have considerably phsyically developed but at 12, they are still little more than a kid physically. But I don't really take an interest in studying paedophilia so its not like Im particularly informed on the subject anyway.

I understand. But even full-grown, "normal" adults can be turned on by a twelve year old in suggestive poses.

On a side note, I read somewhere that there are more pedophiles than there are gay people, but it is hard to track obviously.

Depends. If we're talking Pedos who get the thoughts, then I'd believe it. If you mean people who act on those thoughts, then no way.

Yeah, I meant the former.

But if 1 in 10 people are supposedly gay doesn't that mean, 1 in 9 or even more than that people are, well, pedos.
And anonyman, you bring up a good point, but still, regardless on why they are attracted, the reason they are persecuted, or how I intreptate it, is because they are not seen to be mature enough to make a decision such as sex, and can be easily manipulated by others.
Look, I know it's harsh, by I personally believe it's for the best, if only to protect the minority out there.

But yes, they differ from pedos because pedos seem to be defined by people who have a fettish, whereas, those who prey on young kids, possibly even under 12s can do it because of how vunerable, and easily influenced they are.
Either way, these people are still horrble, IMO, and "predators".

But I digrees, those girls are drawn that way in order to look adorable and cute, which is in the style of most anime, and so japanese school girls can identify with them, however, they are teenagers pruley because they're just in reach of japanese male teenagers, or in this case, Ghost, being attracted to them.
Therefore, the reason why these kids watch these shows, Ghost you can argue whatever you want but kids love how shows look, and don't care so much what actually happens.
Although I'm afraid I don't know too much on the toppic, so forgive me if I'm wrong.

Your logic is so flawed I simply cannot begin to explain it's immense level of wrongevity.

I quite like my made up word

Me too.

BTW MUDLING
I'm just saying. No opinions here.

What I'm trying to say, is that I can't comprehend petos being so common, but I guess it's possible, if they simply don't take action.
And no offence taken, this is a forum, say whatever you want. :)

Pedos are far more common than you think; the media just doesn't cover them that much. I assume you are a little conservative in your beliefs, purely because you haven't been exposed to half of the shit that's out there.

Hey mudling. Do me a favor and go to 4chan.org
Have fun, darling.

http://img354.imageshack.us/img354/1941/rollcallgn2.png

it is a fact, that most rapes happen to exercise power, and not allways have anything to do with the age or even the gender of the victim. p.e. prison rapes. it is relativly unlike that the rapists are all gays...

I was going to make some witty but not very funny and jack-ass like comment about being raped in the PE changing rooms, but this then prompted me to think about what actually does go on in the PE changing rooms.

This could explain why people in my class, who I'm sure are perfectly straight guys, go round shoving their fingers up your arse, or slap your ass etc.

That's a common social process called male bonding, in the old days before Catholicism pretty much everyone was bi, this is how people like that get rid of their unconscious urge for it, that and contact sports.

Ilu Freud

I'm bored of every offtopic thread being about sex or game threads.

Fuck you guys.

That was never said.

lol yaoi cock

1. No you aren't a pedophile unless you touch.
2. I think hentai is not allowed on owf...

How is that Hentai?

God I want to strangle you sometimes.




All the time.

That is not hentai.

Would you like me to show you hentai?

Because I can show you hentai.

Don't, and be thankful you missed the deleted posts and flame war =D.

You guys had a flame war without me? There hasn't been a flame war without me in fucking years! FUCKING GODDAMMIT, ALCAR! DO YOU SEE WHAT HAS HAPPENED!?

I know it's not, I was joking

Nah I know sites to watch it

No you can't. Not allowed :P

Seriously, why are you still here?

http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f2..._ark/Char3.jpg
He is drawn to Char.

We don't need a history lesson on fucking anime... Use your damn blog for that stuff.

You're an idiot. Seriously.

I was going to flame you and insult your intelligence, but I realised that wouldn't be very constructive, so I deleted it.

Scientific studies can get exemptions for that sort of thing. Sure, they'd have to get it approved, but after all, stopping research on something because material involved is illegal is pretty contrary to progress, and not many governments are that dumb. Regulation, yes. But banning research into illegal material because illegal material is handled is stupid.

You have no idea, I study Psychology at Glasgow university using the standard APA guideline for ethical implications of experiments, what expertise have you got? Governments do not control Psychological studies, university guidelines do, including ethical panels using a wide range of academic and naive judges, in the current climate of political correctness we're in I cannot see any of them consenting to using pedophilic material to conduct research.

Also it should be noted that my statement is applicable to Western World cultures in the last twenty to thirty years, I can fully accept this experiment happening if those conditions are not met, although in that case I cannot see the results of such an experiment being very viable at all.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Also, WoF is probably right.

Are you so mentaly chalenged that you can't even respond to something as simple as that in a normal fashion? You're the idiot here, starting your post with "Actualy, I think..." would have made you look a lot more matuire. Fail.

:D

I'll take it that was in jest

LOL

I get it I get it, jeez :p. It was a quick post okay, didn't bother to check the spelling.

:p

Jinxed... XD

why wouldnt be the results viable?

First you have to consider participants of such an experiment, imagine a advertisement in a student magazine asking for participants to come along to view sexual pictures of little girls, what kind of people are you liable to get in response to such an advert? Certainly not a representative sample of the student community. I know I wouldn't sign up for such an experiment regardless of the monetary or credit value earned. If the experiment used deception to lure in it's participants then the ethical flaws in such a study would be immense, what happens if you show a picture of a naked child to a fifty year old lecturer and he has a heart attack? Or if you have fundamentalist christian undergrads throwing up and claiming lawsuits left right and center? This is what I meant earlier when I said that such a study would just not pass.

Next just consider the methodology of such an experiment, the beastly thing doesn't even bear talking about. A study like that would be methodologically a mess, if you were using a within participants design you would be very wary of the participants who agreed to carry on after the first run 'Yes I want to look at more pictures of naked girls in the name of science' the kind of people who want to see more will jar your results horrifically, also keep in mind that ethical values between cultures vary a long way, it might be viewed as normal in some collectivist cultures to find twelve year old girls sexually attractive.

Standards nowdays, and in western cultures are far more stringent than standards anywhere else, think of Nazi Germany where the results of psychological experiments were manipulated by the government or the middle east where some research is just not allowed, needless to say that temporally standards have changed quite a lot too, not just ethically. Any study done like that would lack both internal and external validity and make it wide open to critical assailt.

It should be noted I was pretty drunk by the end of that post

OH FUCK A DOUBLE POST

Fixed!
Max…

DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOU MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAX D:

Why? What the hell did I ruin?
Max…

Dear lord man.