my (pretty average) computer can play Crysis

on low mind

CoD 4 is good fun, if a little frustrating. I have only played multiplayer though

Crysis is pretty but nothing special.

I'd buy all these games, if I had the money.

I'd spam to make my post count massive if I thought it would earn me more respect within the forum.

COD4 is much better than expected. I haven't got the other two.

F-Damn I thought this thread allready died.
Anyway after a few months I bought BOTH of theese gamez.
I also have PS3 anyway... If you ask me Crysis is a lot better then Assassin SC because when you finish all missions of ASA you get bored. But I never get bored with Crysis.
Anyway I don't say ASA is not good I just like Crysis for more.

AlienMagi

I'll buy Assassin's Creed for PS3, i love that, but is a little copied to Prince of Persia

it is not really copied, it simply made by the same guys

Ubisoft?
Riight, well i didn't know!

That doesn't matter anyway...

Why the hell do you keep calling the game "Assassin SC", and "ASA"?!
It's Assassins Creed, for crying out loud! AC! OMGWTFBBQ!

Not that I play them... PC can't handle them, and I don't have a PS3. I could buy AC for Xbox360 though...

cod 4 is amazing online but the story's abit short.
and i absolutely LOVED assassins creed because its so much fun to play.My only flaw with it is that it gets slightly repetitve.
but both excellent games.

Anything made by Valve is the dogs bollocks- Half Life 2 and Portal in perticular, I love those games. Unfortunatly, I'm stuck with a slightly crapper PC then I'm used too, and Half Life 2 won't run at a level I'm happy at, which bloody well sucks, as I still havn't completed it yet!

Talking about Half Life and Crysis- remember when Half Life 2 was the benchmark for all gaming technology. Hardly anyone could play it, and there were jokes about robots from the future that could count the number of atoms in a star AND play TWO copies of Half Life 2 at once. Well, Half Life 2 is a bit more acheivable now, and is even started to look a bit dated. But the point is, notice how Crysis has replaced it as the high end of gaming tech?

Because it's shorter and I don't have time to write it correctly... Why do you ask?
This is totally off topic...

so....everyone else whose posted comments about it in this thread are not off-topic,huh?

Yes they are, and I hate when everyone do that to my threads!

yes but everyone who has talked about it have talked about 1 or both of the games this thread was intended for aswell.so as long as people still talk about them two games,it okay.

Ok, whatever then...
But i still think you should make Cod thread for that.

Yes these two games are really suit for the new generation.I almost enjoy this game.

No, there is a difference between HL and Crysis and that is that by the time HL2 came out it might have had some huge specs but the hardware to run it on max specs was available on the market at normal prices (which I know since I happened to have a computer running HL2 on full at the time). The hardware to run Crysis on full specs is either not even released yet, or costs a billion dollars in the store.
And on that note, Crysis' graphics are impressive only when set on maximum. Set it down even one notch and it's nothing special anymore.

It eez, umm, how you say... Tres Annoyance!