Sorry Dino. I didn't mean to say anything offensive in any way. I know I'm an asshole most of the time.

Wow what a Shi*thead. Sorry about your freind Dipstikk. She is a ****ing retard, and a bitch.

There is no real court case. There's too many holes in the story.

Also, no trauma and evidence (beyond the words of an 11-year old). "Innocent until proven guilty" will stand.

Your friend might want to arrange a counter-suit for defimation of character (having it implied that he molested an 11-year old)

---
Not by law... but to the general public, probably.

"Shouldn't a medical examiner and/or a shrink be able to deduce whether she was molested? From what I understand, those sort of incidents leave mental and physical scars."
"Actually from what I understand, children who've been molested often thought when it was happening that it was some kind of game - either that or they just didn't realise the gravity of the situation. It's only later on that they realise the seriousness of what happened and come to terms with it."

^ While both of these are true, an 11-year old who can imediatly say "I've been molested" would have physical trauma {or at least physical evidence}. If there was a "mental block" to make them think it wasn't wrong, it wouldn't disapear in under 30 minutes.


"he shouldn't of lifted her by the arms and shoved her out of the room"
^ Why not, Paramite Mask? He did not harm her in any way {assuming he isn't lying about what he did}. All he did was remove an annoyance.

...actually, that's a much better case. Get her to define "molestation" {on court in her own words}

As I've stated previously, the definition of molestation is very general (as it should be) and does not necessarily imply anything to do with intercourse. So there would not be any physical signs if all an attacker did was grab the victims breasts or something similar.

I believe the LEGAL definition is forced insertion of oneself into another person (any part of you in any part of them.)

What, so if you're an immature little scamp, and if you 'wet willy' someone in the ear, you can get done for molestation?

Laws suck.

But that means ive been Molesting my friends! GROSS! are you sure a wet willy counts as molesting , PLEASE SAY IT DOESNT! Dipstikk , your friend easily has a 89.9 chance out of 100 in winning this whole thing , That biyatch has bitten off more than she can chew!

No, that's the legal definition of rape. Molestation is more general.

Oh right!

That is Rape, not Molestation.

...although that'll probably creep out outlaw king more. ^.-.^

AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! Ive been raping my friends! curse this world! * jumps into a very deep hole * Now i cant hurt anyone . God , so if you really :

Pick someone elses nose
Give someone a wet willy
clean out someone elses ears
Put your finger in someone elses mouth

Your a RAPIST??????????????

Wow , that sucks.

For ****s sake, outlaw king. Grow up and stop posting like a damn ruffian.

Uh, small question here. But what's a wet willy? o.o;

You need mental help if you actualy did that...

No , ive never done that , but im sure some really weird people do. A wet willy is when you slobber all over one of your fingers and stick it in someones ear . Ive got it down to a fine art , and find that if you lightly blow on the drooly finger you get the " eww cold spit! " effect . Remember that the finger has to go right in or its a dud wet willy.

That... is disgusting... and painfull...

Yes I know. I've never given one and probably never will. I've recieved a few though. The idea of someone's germs and bacteriastuck up in your ear is just sick. If I get another one I'll probably return it with a punch in the face seeing as how I'm a bit unstable at the moment.

I'm not unstable and I would pretty much kick your ass into the hospital if someone did that to me =/...

Jesus, when I read your last posts before reading Outlaw King's I thought you were talking about ****ing up the ear. :p

Shinshi-Shinshi?
I swear on my Grandmother's grave I couldn't not resist.
/aaaAND the GOAT MEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeet....

WTF??!!

what the 'ell was that post about? Hey , your a glukkon big cheese! Nice to meet ya.

But seriously , what is that post all about? Im confused.

This absolutely hilarious SNL sketch on the best of Will Farrel volume II.
Christopher Walken and this kinky older couple. Shinshi Shinshi is trespassing where no man has trespassed...namely the ear canal.
/aAAAAND the GOAT MEEEeeeeeeeeeeat.

Ah huh , I see , thanks for clearafying that up.

Having read that account Dip, I gotta say that that girl should have NO chance in hell of winning the cas, if your friend's account is true. Picking somebody up and moving them is not molestation, that girl is a lying b**ch. Unfortunately, the 'aww, cute girls don't lie' mentality will probably increase her chances, plus the fact that whenever someone is accused of rape or molestation, they always getc put under a guilty spotlight by the press, all those hearing the case htink they're guilty etc. Good luck to your friend.
Also, if these technicalities abotu rape and molesting are true, some of my friends have raped each other (wet wilies were very common in my year about 4 years ago), and do molest each other. Which is idiotic. This is a case of refer to my signature, these sort of technicalities shouldn't or exist and wouldn't if I could do anything about it, which I can't.