Re: Re: Re: Bush bans Human Cloning in US
:
2. You're partially correct but we don't clone humans because it would just be a waste of money. |
Jacob, my name has got 2 t's in it it goes like this. Statikk HDM. If yah can't manage that, Hunter will suffice. Thanks. Cloning is so lame because science is a trial and error game right? So we could make the human if we tried but failed a lot, and than the human could have a malady, like be a catatonic scizophreinc, or be horribly and painfully disfigured. Which leads us to the choice of euthanasia or let the human suffer, After a bunch of scientific misteps we could create a clone but we wouldn't know the psychological implications of the cloning. It isn't cost effective. Almost no one supports it so getting the funding would be a bitch. So cloning is just one big can of worms that shouldn't be opened.
|
In my own opinion I hope that when they make a human clone it dies. I shouldn't wish death on people but I really hope it dies. I know I'm being a bitch (I'm born to bitch :D) but it might teach humans a lesson not to clone things (of course I bet it won't.) I can't agree with you more Statikk, cloning is pointless that's all there is too it.
|
:
For example, Dolly the sheep has a disorder which is being blamed on a complication of the cell nuclear replacement. |
2 deaf Lesbians wanted a child...they could choose the genes. They chose to make the child deaf also. This is true and was sposedly why Bush got all ban happy in the 1st place.
|
:
I mean, there is absolutely nothing connecting cloning to anything like Schizophrenia. I really think you ought to learn something about certain things before arguing about them... |
:
If it is then this has nothing to do with cloning. If it isn't then I appologise for mentioning this similar-sounding story. |
:
|
:
1. But they didn't. 2. Can Bush really be idiotic enough to ban cloning because somebody chose the father of their baby? |
:
|