I keep forgetting how easy it is just to put Strike Witch on ignore.
As a matter of fact, I should probably just start ignoring this whole thread. When Scraptrapman starts coalescing the whole Seven Days/Big Bang thing together, you know your argument has probably long-since stagnated. |
Yeh, basically I'm ready to do Exoddus and Revelation!
|
:
|
Sorry, shall I change it? 2nd edish and all that =)
|
I like how the particle is sentient.
|
If that's you target, STM, I've nothing to worry about in terms of this deba(te/cle), but everything to worry about your education and scientific literacy.
Particularly since you started out at the beginning to say "ignoring proof". I used to respect you but now be feel confident summing up the whole of your being into those two words. This isn't like me, but it's been building along time, and you are unfortunate enough to be there for the blast. For years now I've argued and debated with people whose understanding of science could be represented by a great big question mark drawn in yellow crayon, yet their confidence in their understanding of it dwarfs that of Stephen Hawking. So for years I've watched as people propose to fight on my soil, and instead roll around naked in the mud expecting me to be cowed into submission by the spectacle, and in response all I can do is what their science teachers were supposed to do, and in presenting the evidence for my case do all their homework for them. They clearly weren't interested the first time around. Why then should I be interested in the impotent tirades they excrete all over my screen? No. Why should I tolerate that? Why, when you have expressed your argument in such a tiresome and childish form as yours? Why, when you already agree that your stance is ridiculous as evidenced by your using of your sacred text as a model for ridicule? Why, when you seem to genuinely think that decades of work by thousands of scientists to unlock the greatest of mysteries can be summarised so flippantly and erroneously? What sort of bullshit is that? I'm all for ridicule of bad ideas, but in selecting this target, which vastly exceeds the sum total intellectual achievements of the church, you have convicted yourself of such imbecility, you have no idea. It's no wonder you required the disclaimer "ignoring proof". It's the only way to equalise the arguments! |
Ok you want an argument in the proof of existence of God then here goes because BM, I myself find that I have to prove his existence to other people, and unfortunately to myself because I am not exempt from the possibility that all I know is a lie, unfortunately theologists and stubborn atheists and other groups would take my belief away from me and instead install a mind numbingly boring alternative view that we die and that is it, fucking end of story, people would take that away from me in an instant to make me feel as they do.
So before I begin this reply I want you to know that I am not trying to convert you or make you see the light, I'm trying my best to hold my own and allow you respect me once again if you ever really did. You'll have ot excuse my wording because I can't put my ideas down on paper well without having problems... It is my belief that the Universe has infinite complexity and that it's ever changing form must be sustained by some super intelligent commanding being with enormous power, you cannot simply put the creation of the universe into the following which so many scientists feel they have proof to say, "The universe was created by the Boson particle, there was one and now the universe is enormous...red shift proves this and so it must be true!" Well ok, fair enough but how can you explain the following, The Earth's size and corresponding gravity holds a thin layer of mostly nitrogen and oxygen gases, only extending about 50 miles above the Earth's surface. If Earth were smaller, an atmosphere would be impossible, like the planet Mercury. If Earth were larger, its atmosphere would contain free hydrogen, like Jupiter. Earth is the only known planet equipped with an atmosphere of the right mixture of gases to sustain plant, animal and human life. The Earth is located the right distance from the sun. Consider the temperature swings we encounter, roughly -30 degrees to +120 degrees. If the Earth were any further away from the sun, we would all freeze. Any closer and we would burn up. Even a fractional variance in the Earth's position to the sun would make life on Earth impossible. The Earth remains this perfect distance from the sun while it rotates around the sun at a speed of nearly 67,000 mph. It is also rotating on its axis, allowing the entire surface of the Earth to be properly warmed and cooled every day. Do I need to explain the gravatic effect of the moon, I doubt it, you seem to know a lot about astrology. How can that be chance, or luck or universal accident or anything else but a divine being, Steven Weinberg, a Nobel laureate in Physics, said at the moment of this massive explosion, "the universe was about a hundred thousands million degrees centigrade...and the universe was filled with light." The universe has not always existed. It had a start...what caused that? Scientists have no explanation for the sudden explosion of light and matter. All instruction, all teaching, all training comes with intent. Someone who writes an instruction manual does so with purpose. So is DNA not an enormous instruction manual? DNA is a three-billion-lettered manuak telling the cell to act in a certain way, that could not have formed from some isolated pool of amino acids, it could not have become emobided in a ceulluar object and it could not have survived without constant nurturing to slowly evolve and expand it's range of control over the Earth. That is impossible, all attempts to try and recreate such a phenomenon in a lab has failed. Does God exist? We know God exists because he pursues us. He is constantly initiating and seeking for us to come to him. Many atheists find the issue of people believing in God bothers them greatly. What is it about atheists that we would spend so much time, attention, and energy refuting something that they don't believe even exists?! What causes them/you to do that? God is always pressing the issue. So then you have come to find out that God wants to be known. He created us with the intention that we would know him. He has surrounded us with evidence of himself and he keeps the question of his existence always upon us, always! I am not an idiot, I hide behind childish tendencies but this is my final argument. |
I'm not trying to convert you but you're wrong because I read wikipedia hail jesus
|
:
Let me ask you this: do you believe this is the only planet in the entire universe which sustains life? Do you believe this is the only universe at all? Think of all the billions of planets devoid of life - it seems pretty obvious to me that yes, we are that random lucky coincidence. EDIT: At this point we should just merge the Wikileaks and cogito ergo sum threads because it's like a mirror image. |
:
|
:
|
U guys, that was for BM.
@Oddhunter, I don't know, I like to think there are aliens and other life off our own planet but perhaps they are humanoid if they are intelligence now that my friend would prove god for me 100000% |
But the existence of other sentient life forms in the universe directly contradicts your earlier argument that humanity can't just be mere coincidence.
|
Unless, all other forms of alien life are genetically identical to humans because the evolution process does not differ from planet to planet?
|
You're assuming:
a) Only planets identical to earth are capable of supporting life b) That any alien life forms must start from the same basic genetic life form humans did c) That any alien planets capable of supporting life must develop in the same way as earth, including natural disasters and history d) That even if all of the above conditions are met, evolution must result in the same exact species being created 100% of the time. Your logic is full of holes. |
This first quote is a few pages too late, but here goes...
:
:
|
Depends on the evolutionary processes involved in forming other aliens, we have know way of knowing if our bodies are any different to other alien sentients.
|
Even if they looked exactly like us, the difference in minerals or chemicals in their planet would most likely mean we would never be able to share airspace or food.
|
I hope I didn't screw something up X_x, but now you've got yourself another thread.
|
This thread is so stupid.
|
:
God would be cool, if he wasn't so..... restricting. You know? |
JEBUS!
Define restricting, do you mean restricting as in stopping idolatry, sodomy and murdering your neighbours? Yeh that's terrible ;) |
|
No, restricting as in you're going to hell for having sex outside of marriage, having bastard children, take drugs and say my baby boys name in vain. That's my view on how restricting his his.
|
@Ridg3, when the Bible was written you have to remember that it was a different time with different social morals and etiquette. To be fair usually a couple that has sex after marriage has a longer marriage, religious or not, bastard children are generally harder to raise, the Bible says nothing about drugs (not including alcohol I suppose). So it's not that bad, and saying Jesus in vain is like swearing or using a divine name as an insult so you must be able to see why that's bad.
|
:
Great. Putting words in someone's mouth is a good way to win a debate :) No.. I'm more with Ridg3 on this one. Also, you can't use the whole "Bible was written in another time", cos essentially, that makes me think it shouldn't be followed anymore cos it's outdated. Which it is. You don't want that, do you? You have to argue for why it should still be followed even if it's outdated, cos if you don't follow it, you're going to heeeell!! D= |
(remove)
|
@Nexy, well some of the bible is outdated, if I'm honest I believe God created the world but I don't know about the way it is portrayed in Genesis however, quite a bit of the late Old Testament and most of the New Testament can be applied to modern life such as love thy Melbourne.
|
ok,sorry gonna remove that,may i ask why do we have to argue and debate if god exists,if someone thinks he exists let him think that if not he doesnt have to,this is like a war for eternity :/
|
:
|
Oh yea. I'm all for Sodomy too :D That's one of the stupid restrictions I was talking about. (I just googled the word).
In fact, I find the whole "Your body is your temple" pretty stupid. If it's my temple, I should be able to decide it's rules and stuff, no? |
can i ask,if god made the universe,where did he came from? :I
|
For the record, I do the sodomizing.
|
:
|
:
Do you have proof for any of this at all? Or are you just talking out of your ass, as usual? |
:
:
|
My brother is a bastard child, and we all know how he turned out.
Though, in a loose definition so am I. |
How did he turn out?...
|
Picture in your mind the acne riddled, greasy haired, trenchcoated douchebag who uses five dollar words because he honestly believes doing so makes him a better person. Now imagine him actually believing that Norse mythology is real, and using crystals to divine the future.
He turned out worse than that. |
:
|