Oddworld Forums

Oddworld Forums (http://www.oddworldforums.net/index.php)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.oddworldforums.net/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   So, about that Oil spill. (http://www.oddworldforums.net/showthread.php?t=19273)

Mac Sirloin 06-15-2010 10:09 AM

:

()
That seems like it would also be quite detrimental to the environment.

That's the one part I'm going to have to make some guesswork on:
They blow it up pretty deep underground, I think. Like, deep enough for it to work and not have a significant effect beyond a sign that says "Don;t go down this hole."

OANST 06-15-2010 10:15 AM

But what if they hit oil while getting it underground? Triple cluster fuck.

shaman 06-15-2010 12:20 PM

You just answerd your own question. My child.

Nate 06-15-2010 07:39 PM

:

()
Obama said the oil spill was worse than 9/11!!!!!

No he didn't. He said it would have a similar level of effect on domestic policy and politics. Big difference.

:

()
That seems like it would also be quite detrimental to the environment.

Tonnes of nuclear testing has been performed underground, under the ocean. No significant levels of fallout have ever been recorded.

moxco 06-15-2010 08:01 PM

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...2010-00-06.png

Wings of Fire 06-15-2010 08:06 PM

And that means what? BP is good at advertising their damage control?

Big shocker.

Mac Sirloin 06-15-2010 08:38 PM

lol stocks

Sekto Springs 06-17-2010 05:51 PM

:

That's the one part I'm going to have to make some guesswork on:
They blow it up pretty deep underground, I think. Like, deep enough for it to work and not have a significant effect beyond a sign that says "Don't go down this hole."
I may be misunderstanding what you're suggesting, but as a rule I don't think you can actually nuke anything without serious environmental repercussions, let alone that deep underground. It would probably cause a tsunami, or fuck with the continental shelf. Nuking it seems like one of those "replace a big problem with an even bigger one" kind of scenarios.

Nate 06-17-2010 07:47 PM

Did you even read my last post?

For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mururoa...uclear_testing

moxco 06-17-2010 07:56 PM

Wouldn't nuke it just blast open the sea floor, resulting in oil coming out at a much faster rate. Or possibly the nuke could ignite the whole oil reserve, that wouldn't do much good to the environment either.

Nate 06-17-2010 08:06 PM

According to the image in BM's blog post, they had to drill through 13,000 feet of rock to get from the seabed to the top of the oil deposit. That should be more than enough rock to absorb the impact from a small nuke.

Also, how would the oil catch on fire in an environment without gaseous oxygen?

Sekto Springs 06-17-2010 08:11 PM

:

()
Did you even read my last post?

For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mururoa...uclear_testing

I missed your post, but that link didn't really assuage any of my concerns. I'm not concerned about fallout, we're not talking about nuclear testing. I'm concerned about more immediate physical effects on the environment.

It's already been established that with enough dirt and water over something, it's pretty much harmless. But to use the shockwave of a nuclear detonation to clamp shut the oil pipe as Mac suggests seems far-fetched and dangerous. It seems like more would be involved than just burying it, crossing our fingers, and setting it off.

I don't know. I plead ignorance on this topic for the most part. It's just that based on what I know about nukes, using one to solve this issue seems implausible to me. Of course, the term "nuke" denotes alot of things. I probably wouldn't have any objections if someone said "high-powered explosives" instead.

moxco 06-17-2010 08:12 PM

Then what exactly would a nuke achieve. also I was thinking there could be some giant bubbles trapped in the oil deposit, or maybe the explosion would blast enough seawater away to allow oxygen in, making combustion possible.

EDIT: Dammit Sekto.

Sekto Springs 06-17-2010 08:15 PM

As far as combustion goes, I think there's far too much water involved for there to be any prolonged burn. What you have to be concerned about is combustion on the surface, but there would be 13,000 feet of water between the surface oil and any incendiary device we use, so surface combustion hardly seems probable.

Taco 07-12-2010 04:50 AM

What is this I don't even http://www.helium.com/items/1882339-...-killing-event

Bullet Magnet 07-13-2010 08:01 AM

Nuclear weapons aren't that powerful. As weapons of war, sure. By comparison, anyway. Compared to pretty much any natural system or phenomenon, however, they're tiny. Earthquakes don't open up fissures to oil reserves, and the radiation is nothing compared to what we dump in the ocean as a matter of course (or ever to what's present naturally).

Al the Vykker 07-13-2010 01:33 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/06/15/oil...ner/index.html

Interesting case of real life imitating art. Water World anyone?

Sekto Springs 07-13-2010 02:11 PM

Dont know if anyone posted this yet.


Al the Vykker 07-16-2010 10:31 PM

From the news reports I saw yesterday, BP's engineers were able to cap and stop the flow of oil for the first time since the spill started 84 days ago. I don't know how well this clean-up is going to fair, but I really hope it takes a positive turn.

Dipstikk 07-17-2010 08:27 AM

Well, that's good.

NOW BLOW THAT FUCKER SKY-HIGH! BLOW IT UP! BLOW UP! BIG EXPLOSIONS, BOOSSSSHHHHH! KABOOM! AHAHAHAHAHA! KILL IT! KILL IT ALL!

Dixanadu 07-18-2010 12:17 AM

Is there any pictures from the shoreline? I have it in my mind that it's tarnished to shit.

Prove me wrong, by all means.

Sekto Springs 07-20-2010 10:41 AM

I considered posting this in Bits and Pieces, but I figured this thread wasn't too old to show this.

I think Justin will appreciate this one.

Pilot 07-20-2010 10:44 AM

Wow, whoever did those certainly left all those artifacts on purpose to be found out.

MarsMudoken 07-21-2010 10:13 AM

The people who were tasked with stopping this make me look smart.

Think about that for a second.

Josh 07-21-2010 10:25 AM

No, they really don't.