Oddworld Forums

Oddworld Forums (http://www.oddworldforums.net/index.php)
-   Oddworld Discussion (http://www.oddworldforums.net/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Were Lorne and Sherry always romantically involved? (http://www.oddworldforums.net/showthread.php?t=24220)

Nepsotic 03-24-2017 01:04 AM

They really don't though, I never said I agree with it, but that's just how it is and it's a fact you have to accept or not gain any notoriety in the public eye or elsewhere.

STM 03-24-2017 01:51 AM

Rights to privacy are a spook.


Do you think Lorne and Sherry participate in Oddworld themed roleplay in the bedroom? I definitely would if I created it.

Nepsotic 03-24-2017 02:32 AM

I would even if I didn't create it.

Xavier 03-24-2017 03:24 AM

:

()
Rights to privacy are a spook.


Do you think Lorne and Sherry participate in Oddworld themed roleplay in the bedroom? I definitely would if I created it.

What part of "stay classy" didn't you understand?

That's an official warning.

STM 03-24-2017 08:32 AM

Genuinely apologise, Xav. It was meant to be a bit tongue in cheek but I can see how it came off.

Nepsotic 03-24-2017 08:57 AM

:

()
What part of "stay classy" didn't you understand?

That's an official warning.

But you just said

:

I'm not going to tell you guys what you should and shouldn't discuss.

Xavier 03-24-2017 09:05 AM

Yes indeed, I feel we shouldn't discuss Sherry and Lorne's private life at all but I'm not going to forbid it. At the end of that post however I explicitly requested people to "stay classy".

Also the rules state: "Do not discuss infractions or bans given to members."
The warning I just gave falls in that category.

So, congratulations Nep, you got yourself an official warning too.

Nepsotic 03-24-2017 09:09 AM

:

Also the rules state: "Do not discuss infractions or bans given to members."
The warning I just gave falls in that category.
What?
:

So, congratulations Nep, you got yourself an official warning too
Why?

Does this make sense in your mind because I'm not following your logic. I never even mentioned infractions or bans, and even if I had, so does everyone else, including all the mods, including you, so you're really just getting up my arse over nothing aren't you?

Xavier 03-24-2017 09:25 AM

Logic is as follows:

1. STM crosses the line
2. I give him a warning
3. He reached out via PM, we discussed and everything is fine now
4. He even apologizes publicly
5. You come in, quote the fact I give him a warning (which is the same as mentioning it) and try to use my own words against me to question the warning I just gave.

You argument against Admin and Mods being allowed to announce bans is ridiculous and you know it.

This incident is now closed, you are more than welcome to send me a PM if you want to further discuss it privately.

Vlam 03-24-2017 11:51 AM

If the question's answered then shouldn't the thread be closed?

Nate 03-24-2017 11:53 AM

We don't generally close threads. We let them naturally peter out.

Xorlidyr 03-27-2017 02:51 AM

This place is no democracy. I am 6 years late to understand this.

Vlam 03-27-2017 08:49 AM

:

()
We don't generally close threads. We let them naturally peter out.

This thread got closed:
http://www.oddworldforums.net/showthread.php?t=16941

AvengingGibbons 03-27-2017 09:54 AM

I'm not surprised (Did you read OANST's post?) she aint even fat and she's a beautiful woman with good values if her interview is anything to go by

Crashpunk 03-27-2017 10:29 AM

I don't think I've ever seen a thread derail that quickly.

Nate 03-27-2017 08:55 PM

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/generally