:
:
“i couldn’t care less about your opinion on my opinion” The sheer stupidity in putting these two statements together is astounding. |
Why do you continue to instigate?
|
I thought your being a little shit was a state of being, not something that was instigated.
|
Why do you continue to post like this when you've been called on it several times recently?
:
Part of me would really like to be annoyed with Manco for dragging this on for so long. |
It's based on the label the glukkons would use. If anything, it's too good. How am I supposed to believe that a glukkon made this? They don't have drawing arms!
|
:
You both have already made your points. Just stop. |
:
Anyway I don't think anyone's gone into detail about the colours yet? They really don't contrast well at all considering they were trying to "make it pop" with the whole complimentary colours thing, and it's just so poorly done. I mean, it's obvious what they were going for but in the end it just didn't work and they kept it anyway. Also why didn't they use a full-on black anywhere? it confuses me, it just looks all grey and gross. |
I went into a full on tangent about how poor a choice the colours were at some point. I'm tempted to find the post again because god dammit
:
|
:
I tried altering the original in Photoshop. I put the Proof Setup into grayscale and blindly adjusted the saturation, levels and contrast until I had much more contrast in the greys. Then I turned color back on, and this was the result: http://i.imgur.com/12mxmmm.jpg I think a lot of the issues with the logo come down to a lack of polish – with some more attention to detail, it could be a solid composition, but little flaws let it down. |
It's almost disgusting how such a simple adjustment improves the logo so significantly, but it's not something they ever bothered doing.
Also, I found the post where I bitched about the colours |
Well, solid composition, yes, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's good. Yours is much better if only because to the addition of actual black.
The overall design in general is pretty piss-poor, going back to something I said earlier, which I'm assuming you skipped over. :
|
I saw that, but I didn't really understand what you meant by it. Do you not like the idea behind the logo at all? Given that the game is about industrialisation, the 50s style really fits.
If anything the new logo has more to do with the "image" of the game than this one. http://speeddemosarchive.com/gfx/AbesOddysee_1.jpg |
I really like Manco's edit. Grabs my attention so much more, the original looks completely washed out in comparison.
The tiny bit of white in the ear slit still bothers the fuck out of me though. |
You know you love the ear slit, Vyrien. Don't deny your true feelings.
|
You got me there, I love me some slits.
|
:
I have to say that one thing I’m really sick of is video game logos’ insistence on being as 3D and complex as possible. |
I'm curious to see if there were other logos put into consideration when the current logo was picked.
|
:
|
:
|
:
http://oddworldlibrary.net/archives/...k2Qn16YTOH.jpg |
Wow, it's almost like they hired an amateur fanartist to make the logo at short notice OH WAIT THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED.
The aesthetic is fine, and the colour scheme is fine. The neck is off, and maybe the mouth should be black, and I'm pretty sure I posted an altered version myself the first time around, but there's complaining about something minor that you'll look at for all of the game*, and complaining about a minor element of something minor, that you'll only see once, for a few seconds. For the love of all that's holy, knock it off. It's a very noticeable shift in style, yes, but that's why the game is called New 'n' Tasty - JAW are trying to market the game as a highly transparent Glukkon rebrand; "The game you love: Now with 68% more 3D!" It's not fucking Dragon's Crown. We had a a boring argument about it already, guys. We each said our piece and let it be. I'll remind you all that the person who started this argument only did so because they weren't present at the first one. The prudent thing to do would have been to just link him back, not resurrect a dead discussion. P.S. If you think this :
If you all hate the logo that much, just make a new one and email it to JAW - you'll have the same odds the first guy did. As for Manco, you may as well drop him a line. God forbid OANST sees all this, he's too young for heart failure. *And at least I accept my complaints as minor, rather than, and I quote, "destroying the image of the entire series" :
:
Dezzinerz |
Have you noticed they fixed the mouth, the ear slit and the connection between the neck and the top of the gear in the newest trailer?
|
:
:
:
:
|
:
|
:
I quite like the logo if I'm honest. I think it works much better when used in some kind of context, like in the trailer or on the website. With regards to people saying that it would stand out better with more contrast, when set against a black background (as in the trailer), the muted palette does stand out a lot. Perhaps the intention is to mostly set it against a darker backdrop. It genuinely does appear like branding so I can definitely see the angle they're coming from, though I do personally prefer the older more detailed logos. |
:
http://i293.photobucket.com/albums/m...ps4b67544f.png |
Pupbenny, no...
|
it's amazing, pupbenny! the greatest work of art i've ever laid eyes on! send it to OWI with a usuage proposition and a set fee. then watch your bank account grow.
i vote yours to replace the original. it just works so well. hows the forum skin coming along? |
I think it's the font that doesn't do it for me, it looks too fancy and light hearted. Personally I think that it would have suited better if the logo was a RF barrel spilling out flesh with a red stencil 'NEW N TASTY' stamped on it. But that's my personal opinion you don't have to agree with it
|
WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU KNOW
|