Oddworld as a fictional universe is very thorough. A great deal of effort has gone into crafting a perfectly realised, believable alien world. In SW, there was quite an odd (not in the good way!) mix of both alien and somewhat frustratingly human machinery and architecture.
Throughout the series we have been led to believe that Oddworld is a dark, foreboding planet ruled by aliens. It is unbelievable that aliens, completely unaware of our culture, would design and build things the same way- take the narrow, hand rail-less walkways from the industrial buildings of AO/AE. Humans would never build such a death-trap factory. That's what made it alien and a fitting part to the dark nature of Oddworld. Why did SW have human tractors and caravan trailers? What is strange is that there was also a can-shaped tractor machine which loosely resembled the design of greeters and snoozers, which fitted very well with Oddworld's alien atmosphere. I guess the point is that everything should be consistently alien and authentic to Oddworld, if our suspension of disbelief is to remain intact. When we start seeing any kind of contradiction to that alien world, in terms of references, character design, or architecture etc, it breaks the believability of the world which has been so painstakingly crafted. For what? If it's just cheap referential humour, that's a pretty big sacrifice, and one which I would say simply isn't worth it. |
:
But you really don't see it in SW? The Clakkerz and the Grubs are both just large talking versions of animals we have on Earth. Again, I'm not saying they broke the wall. They just keep winking at it. |
The general consensus seems to be that neither Munch's Oddysee nor Stranger's Wrath hold a candle to the first two games, so I guess I'll just stick to those for the time being! It's not like I'm in any danger of getting bored of them, I'm currently working my way through Abe's Oddysee for what must be the gazillionth time.
|
Stranger's Wrath is a pretty damn good game, though. It's a huge step in the right direction if you look at MO.
|
:
:
Abe's Oddysee: 85 Abe's Exoddus: 88 Munch's Oddysee: 80 Stranger's Wrath: 88 Not really that offputting, surely. |
:
Abe's Oddysee: 90 Abe's Exoddus: 89 Munch's Oddysee: 64 Stranger's Wrath: 74 |
Stranger's Wrath should be an 80. If it wasn't and Oddworld game, I would give it a 90.
|
:
Still, I wonder why people think anything that has an 80~ score is bad since that's pretty high. But you should never let a review score decide for you. If you like Oddworld, it's at least worth a look, but if you're not that interested then just watch videos or something, that'll give you a good idea of what the game is about. |
Try Stranger's Wrath man :) My favourite is Abe's Oddysee but after that - Stranger for sure! Oddworld feel to the max in this one. Munch is (imo) sh!t.
A. Oddysee: 100 A. Exoddus: 80 Munchee: 30 Strangers Wrath: 88 |
:
At least some of the defunct construction equipment was based on unused concept art for MO. That was kind of neat, but it's not something you notice right away. |
:
|
Actually, it might have been Hand of Odd concept art. I don't know. I also don't remember exactly where they are. I think it's where you first find Thudslugs in that little valley on the way to the water treatment facility.
|
The yellow can-shaped harvester vehicle seen in the art book can be found, modified into a bulldozer, in the tutorial and Eugene Ius mission.
|
Oddysee : 94
Exoddus: 96 Munch: 80 Stranger's: 85. I love giving out quick reveiws :tard: |
Ratings like "out of 100" are incredibly dumb and pointless.
|
Not really. It's like the 10/10 scores or 5 stars, They all have reasons behind them.
Metacritic rounds all the critics scores up to make one, definite score and gaming magazine (I'm taking the Official Nintendo Magazine as an example) go by this. 0-19% = Unplayable 20-49% = Poor 50-69% = Average 70-84% = Good 85-89% = Excellent 90+% = Outstanding (Gold Award) It all makes sense. |
I mean, for one person reviewing, not for multiple reviews combined.
|
What rating would you prefer individuals give?
|
Qualitative ones.
|
"Out of ten" sounds more reasonable... 88/100? Why not 87/100
EDIT: Qualitative ones. |
Because they thought it was better than that.
|
:
|
It doesn't matter if 'out of 100' reviews suck. In this case we can clearly see the general consensus from fans is to avoid Munch's Oddysee, and give Stranger a try... and that Oddysee and Exoddus rock but we all knew that anyway.
|
Don't avoid Munch's Oddysee! It isn't that bad!
|
True, don't!
|
I plan to play Much when I run out of other things to do with my life.
Hopefully it's HD and better by then. |
Avoid it. It's boring and shit. It's an awful Oddworld game because the atmosphere of the first two just isn't there, and it's an awful game in general because the controls, level designs and many other flaws just aren't up to scratch with modern gaming standards.
|
All opinions and reviews aside, if the OP was whether or not to buy original XBox copies of Munch and Stranger, I really don't see what the issue is in the first place.
I just checked quickly online on Amazon.co.uk. You can pick up used (but very good condition) copies of Stranger for less than two quid, and again very good used copies of Munch for under one pound (!). If you really are an Oddworld fan, at those prices just buy them! If it turns out you don't like the games, what have you lost? One pint of beer A couple chocolate bars A train ticket... List could go on forever :p |
woah
Train tickets cost a pound in Birmingham? What the fuck? |
Quantitative proof that there's nothing of any worth there.
|