Fuck, that's the guy apparently.

http://is11.snstatic.fi/kuvat/ampuja...514684449.jpeg

The guy's a Christian fundamentalist with no apparent ties to Muslim extremists.

The fact that he's not involved with them should never stop one from linking this to Muslim Extremists.

For a terrorist scumbag, he sure is getting some flattering photo-ops.

Guess it pays to be a CHRISTIAN extremist.

Goes to show that it doesn't matter what you believe in - Christianity isn't harmless by any form of imagination, but extremism is always a terrible thing and a very dangerous way of thinking. You can even believe strongly in a good cause such as animal rights or feminism and end up taking it waaay too far, then end up damaging your own cause. It's why I hate PETA so much.

About him and his games though: He's 32 and an adult - Not a child. You can't blame his actions on being influenced by computer games because he should be responsible and know better - Especially since he's been an adult since modern gaming became mainstream (and also it's stupid to see games as a way of training for RL considering they're nothing like each other, no matter how realistic).

I hope people won't be stupid and try to use it as an excuse to censor computer games though, rather than link up his actions to his extremist right-wing political alignment. If what that documentary said was true about the far-right gaining more power in the Nordic countries, I really hope that this will be the thing that will stop them gaining more power.

You dislike PETA and right-wingers? I'm going to try and refrain from turning this into a political rant. Though I admit, some people in PETA do go way to far, giving the organisation as a whole a bad name. Also that guy is of the religious right - something I obviously don't affiliate with.

I forget who said this, but they described PETA as "the activist group that all the other activist groups avoid at parties". My mother used to be a member of PETA, so I got all the trickle down. On the whole, I think PETA has done far more harm than good. It's more like a militia than an activist group. Throwing blood on people wearing fur coats solves nothing.

If I was more of a rebel I'd totally go sabotage greenpeace boats.

The French have already done that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_Warrior_(1955)

Yes, they want the right thing, but go the complete wrong way about it. So now people assume those who support animal rights are clinically insane.

Also I never got the whole blood fur coat thing. Wouldn't all the people requiring new coats increase the demand for animals to be killed?

That kinda reminds me of an Itchy and Scratchy episode actually, when the cat wears its own fur and ends up getting beaten up by animal rights activists with "Fur is murder" signs.

As for the Oslo bombing it comes as a suprise although there's still many details to be uncovered IMO. EDIT: Nevermind more details have been revealed.

I don't think PETA has besmirched the name of all animal rights groups, just their own. The other groups make a point to distance themselves as much as possible from PETA.
My mom actually knows Ingrid Newkirk, their president, and lives near the PETA headquarters. I've never met her myself, but I've heard she actually encourages the militia-like behavior of the members under a sort of "fight fire with fire" pretense. Insanity just begets more insanity, in my opinion. PETA's done some good, but it's undermined by such stunts as printing their magazine covers featuring ideological celebrities wearing suits of bacon and shit.

...

...

...

...

...

Wow.

Well yes, I think that is sort of the point of them mentioning that: they really don't know how much time he will get.

I think (correct me if wrong) he is more concerned with the ambiguity of Norwegian law. Who gets to decide who is deemed a threat, and how long they should be kept imprisoned?

Alcar...

Just shoot the cunt.

I say compose a firing squad of the victims' family members and let them have at him.

Battle-Axes would be more Norwegian.

War cries and talk of ale after the killing, also.

That's kinda what judges are paid to do every day, you know.

I'm more shocked at a legal system that does not include the concepts of life sentences or consecutive sentences.

To be fair to them, it's not like they need it: http://internationalbusiness.wikia.c...the_Crime_Rate
Check out the chart comparing their crime rates to other countries.

I read this on Yahoo news and I was shocked.

This bastard, whoever the hell he thinks he is, should be punished dearly for his actions.

I mean 84 deaths is alot don't you think?

Yeah, he almost tripled the entire year of 2007 alone.

A true tragedy. He'll get what he deserves.

He most likely won't.

I don't think there's any of that infuriating leeway here. 84 people and no doubt of guilt, and everyone hates him.

Plus he's Christian.

What an example he's setting!

Wasn't he doing it because he wanted to get rid of the Muslims and start a revolution in the west. What a fucking nut job, he didn't even attack any Muslims, not that he should have done, he should have kept his disgusting racist notions in his head. Ah yes, he's asking for a religious war were Christians band together to fight the Muslims...what the fuck, we believe in the same God, we aren't any different, the fucking cunt.

I think his point was that it'snot possible to sufficiently punish someone for taking 84 lives. You can't just give him 84 life sentences, or execute him 84 times. It's moments like this that make me wish that there was an afterlife, so that justice can occur.


Where on earth did you hear that? The only theory I've heard so far was that he was violently right-wing and hated the current leftist government and all of their supporters.

It was on the radio today but also here: http://articles.timesofindia.indiati...rensics-expert is just one paper releasing such information.